La colegiatura de la abogacía y la violencia institucional

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.audienceComunidad Universidad de Medellínspa
dc.contributor.authorSeleme, Hugo Omar
dc.coverage.spatialLat: 06 15 00 N degrees minutes Lat: 6.2500 decimal degreesLong: 075 36 00 W degrees minutes Long: -75.6000 decimal degrees
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-16T16:36:10Z
dc.date.available2021-09-16T16:36:10Z
dc.date.issued2019-10-30
dc.descriptionThis article's main goal is displaying the existence of three political theories that might be used for justifying the professional fellowship of lawyers; the corporatism, the pluralism, the republicanism. The political theory adopted will determine the conception of the functions that the lawyer's fellowships perform in its relationship with the State. This work specifically focuses on showing that the fellowship functions as a limit for institutional violence when the adopted paradigm is a republican one.eng
dc.descriptionEl presente trabajo tiene por objetivo mostrar que existen tres teorías políticas que pueden utilizarse para justificar la colegiatura profesional de los abogados: el corporativismo, el pluralismo y el republicanismo. La teoría política que se adopte determinará el modo de concebir las funciones que el colegio de abogados ejerce en relación con el Estado. El trabajo específicamente se concentra en mostrar que la colegiatura funciona como un límite frente a la violencia institucional, cuando el paradigma adoptado es uno de tipo republicano.spa
dc.description.abstractEste trabalho tem o objetivo de mostrar que existem três teorias políticas que podem ser utilizadas para justificar a escola de advogados profissional: o corporativismo, o pluralismo e o republicanismo. A teoria política que se adapte determinará o modo de conceber as funções que a escola de advogados exerce com relação ao Estado. Em específico, o trabalho se concentra em mostrar que o colegiado funciona como um limite ante a violência institucional, quando o paradigma adotado é de tipo republicano.por
dc.formatPDF
dc.format.extentp. 157-177spa
dc.format.mediumElectrónicospa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.22395/ojum.v18n37a6
dc.identifier.eissn2248-4078
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad de Medellínspa
dc.identifier.issn1692-2530
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellínspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.udem.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11407/6428
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad de Medellínspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Derechospa
dc.publisher.placeMedellínspa
dc.relation.citationendpage177
dc.relation.citationissue37
dc.relation.citationstartpage157
dc.relation.citationvolume18
dc.relation.haspartOpinión Jurídica; Vol. 18 Núm. 37 julio-diciembre 2019spa
dc.relation.ispartofseriesOpinión Jurídica; Vol. 18 Núm. 37 (2019)spa
dc.relation.referencesArendt, H. (1958). The Human Condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
dc.relation.referencesArendt, H. (1963). On Revolution. Nueva York: Viking Press.
dc.relation.referencesAuyero, J. (2000). The hyper-shantytown: Neo-liberal violence(s) in the Argentine slum. Ethnography, 1(1), 93-116.
dc.relation.referencesBailey, J. (1977). Pluralist and corporatist dimension of interest representation in Colombia. En J. M. Malloy (Ed.), Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America (pp. 259-302). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
dc.relation.referencesBarak, G. (2003). Violence and nonviolence: pathways to understanding. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
dc.relation.referencesBerlin, I. (2002). Two Concepts of Liberty. En H. Hardy (Ed.), Liberty (pp. 166-217). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesBisig, E. (2014). Del disciplinamiento a la exclusión social: circulación de los jóvenes en la ciudad. En E. Bisig (Ed.), Jóvenes y seguridad: control social y estrategias punitivas de exclusión Código de Faltas Provincia de Córdoba (pp. 117-134). Córdoba: Centro de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales.
dc.relation.referencesBorras, S. y Ross, E. (2007). Land Rights, Conflict, and Violence Amid Neo-Liberal Globalization. Peace Review: A Journal of Social Justice, 19, 1-4.
dc.relation.referencesBruff, I. (2016). Neoliberalism and authoritarianism. En S. Springer, K. Birch y J. MacLeavy (Eds.), The Handbook of Neoliberalism (pp. 107-117). Nueva York: Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesCelesia, F. y Waisberg, P. (2016). La noche de las corbatas: cuando la dictadura silenció a los abogados de los trabajadores. Buenos Aires: Aguilar.
dc.relation.referencesChatterjee, I. (2009). Social conflict and the neoliberal city: a case of Hindu-Muslim violence in India. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 34(2), 143-160.
dc.relation.referencesChubb, J. (1983). Interest groups and the bureaucracy: the politics of energy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesCoffey, J. (2003). Léon Harmel: Entrepreneur as Catholic Social Reformer. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
dc.relation.referencesColeman, L. (2007). The Gendered Violence of Development: Imaginative Geographies of Exclusion in the Imposition of Neo-Liberal Capitalism. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 9, 204-219.
dc.relation.referencesCollier, C. (2008). Neoliberalism and Violence against Women: Can Retrenchment Convergence Explain the Path of Provincial Anti-Violence Policy, 1985-2005? Canadian Journal of Political Science, 41, 19-42.
dc.relation.referencesCox, A. y O’Sullivan, N. (1988). The Corporate State: Corporatism and the State Tradition in Western Europe. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.
dc.relation.referencesDahl, R. (1956). A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
dc.relation.referencesDahl, R. (1958). Hierarchy, Democracy and Bargaining in Politics and Economics. En H. Eulau, S. Eldersveld y M. Janowitz (Eds.), Political Behavior. A Reader in Theory and Research. Glencoe: The Free Press.
dc.relation.referencesDahl, R. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
dc.relation.referencesDahl, R. (1989). Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
dc.relation.referencesEspoz, M. B. (2009). La ciudad y las ciudades-barrio: tensión y conflicto a partir de una lectura de la producción mediática de miedos en el marco de espacios urbanos socio-segregados. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios sobre Cuerpos, Emociones y Sociedad, (1), 78-87
dc.relation.referencesGoldstein, D. (2005). Flexible Justice: Neoliberal Violence and ‘Self-Help’ Security in Bolivia. Critique of Anthropology, 25, 389-411.
dc.relation.referencesHanson, E. (1987). The Catholic Church in World Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
dc.relation.referencesLovett, F. (2012). Harrington’s Empire of Law. Political Studies, 60, 59-75.
dc.relation.referencesMalloy, J. M. (1977). Authoritarianism and corporatism in Latin America: the modal pattern. En J. M. Malloy (Ed.), Authoritarianism and Corporatism in Latin America (pp. 3–22). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
dc.relation.referencesMarchand, M. (2004). Neo-liberal Disciplining, Violence and Transnational Organizing: The struggle for women’s rights in Ciudad Juárez. Development, 47, 88-93.
dc.relation.referencesOrtiz, E. R. (2015). El derecho víctima del terrorismo de Estado 1975-1980. Río Cuarto: UniRío.
dc.relation.referencesPettit, P. (1997). Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesPettit, P. (2012). On The People’s Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesPocock, J. G. A. (1975). The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
dc.relation.referencesRahe, P. (1992). Republics Ancient and Modern: Classical Republicanism and the American Revolution. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
dc.relation.referencesSchmitter, P. y Lehmbruch, G. (Eds.). (1985). Patterns of Corporatist Policy Making. Londres: Macmillan.
dc.relation.referencesSchumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Nueva York: Harper and Row.
dc.relation.referencesSellers, S. (1994). American Republicanism: Roman Ideology in the United States Constitution. Nueva York: New York University Press.
dc.relation.referencesSkinner, Q. (2002). A Third Concept of Liberty. Proceedings of the British Academy, 117, 237-268.
dc.relation.referencesViroli, M. (2002). Republicanism. Nueva York: Hill and Wang.
dc.relation.urihttps://revistas.udem.edu.co/index.php/opinion/article/view/2995
dc.rights.creativecommonsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.sourceOpinión Jurídica; Vol 18 No 37 (2019): julio-diciembre; 157-177
dc.subjectPluralismo
dc.subjectRepublicanismo
dc.subjectCorporativismo
dc.subjectColegiación de abogados
dc.subjectPluralism
dc.subjectRepublicanism
dc.subjectCorporatism
dc.subjectLawyers fellowship
dc.subjectPluralismo
dc.subjectRepublicanismo
dc.subjectCorporativismo
dc.subjectEscola de advogados
dc.titleLa colegiatura de la abogacía y la violencia institucional
dc.titleFellowship of Law and Violence
dc.titleA escola de advogados e a violência institucional
dc.typeArticle
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.localArtículo científicospa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
Opinion_Juridica_448.pdf
Tamaño:
1.33 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.14 KB
Formato:
Plain Text
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Opinión Jurídica Vol. 18, núm. 37 (2019)