Gasto público y déficit fiscal en España (1958-2014)

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.audienceComunidad Universidad de Medellínspa
dc.contributor.authorJaén-García, Manuel; University of Almeria
dc.coverage.spatialLat: 06 15 00 N  degrees minutes  Lat: 6.2500  decimal degreesLong: 075 36 00 W  degrees minutes  Long: -75.6000  decimal degrees
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-14T12:52:02Z
dc.date.available2017-03-14T12:52:02Z
dc.date.issued2016-09-30
dc.descriptionLa formulación de dos ecuaciones diferentes confirma la influencia del déficit en el crecimiento del gasto público en el período 1958-2014. El trabajo aporta dos novedades al análisis de los determinantes del gasto público en España: por una parte, se extiende considerablemente el período objeto de estudio; por otra, se usa el análisis de raíces unitarias y cointegración con puntos de ruptura, que no ha sido utilizado anteriormente en este caso.spa
dc.description.abstractO propósito deste trabalho é analisar um modelo reduzido de determinantes do crescimento do gasto público desde o lado da demanda. O modelo está baseado na hipótese Buchanan e Wagner mas se há adicionado diversas variáveis que se consideram determinantes de demanda do gasto público. A formulação de duas equações diferentes confirma a influência do déficit no crescimento do gasto público no período 1958-2014. O trabalho aporta duas novidades à análise dos determinantes do gasto público na Espanha. Por uma parte se estende consideravelmente o período objeto de estudo. Por outra se usa a análise de raízes unitárias e co-integração com pontos de ruptura que não há sido utilizado anteriormente neste caso.por
dc.format.extentp.17-52spa
dc.format.mediumElectrónicospa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypePDF
dc.identifierhttp://revistas.udem.edu.co/index.php/economico/article/view/1950spa
dc.identifier10.22395/seec.v19n40a1spa
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.22395/seec.v19n40a1
dc.identifier.eissn2248-4345
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad de Medellínspa
dc.identifier.issn0120-6346
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellínspa
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11407/3085
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherUniversidad de Medellínspa
dc.publisherUniversidad de Medellínspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias Económicas y Administrativasspa
dc.publisher.placeMedellínspa
dc.relationhttp://revistas.udem.edu.co/index.php/economico/article/view/1950/1768
dc.relation.citationendpage52
dc.relation.citationissue40
dc.relation.citationstartpage17
dc.relation.citationvolume19
dc.relation.haspartSemestre Económico; Vol. 19, núm. 40 - julio/septiembre 2016spa
dc.relation.ispartofSemestre Económicospa
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSemestre Económico; Vol. 19, núm. 40 (2016)spa
dc.relation.referencesAsworth, J. (1995). The Empirical Relationship between Budgetary Deficits and Government Expenditure Growth: An Examination using Co-integration. In: Public Finance, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 1-18.spa
dc.relation.referencesBeck, M. (1976). The Expanding Public Sector: Some Contrary Evidence. In: National Tax Journal, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 15-2.spa
dc.relation.referencesBeck, M. (1981). Government Spending. Trend and Issues. New York: Praeger, First edition, 135p.spa
dc.relation.referencesBergstrom, T.C. and Goodman, R.P. (1973). Private Demands for Public Goods. In: American Economic Review Vol. 63, No. 3, pp. 280-296.spa
dc.relation.referencesBorcherding, T.E. (1985). The Causes of Government Expenditure Growth: A Survey of the U.S. Evidence. In: Journal of Public Economics Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 359-382.spa
dc.relation.referencesBorcherding, T.E. and Deacon, R.T. (1972). The Demand for Services of Non-Federal Governments. In: American Economic Review, Vol. 62, No. 5, p. 891-901.spa
dc.relation.referencesBuchanan J. and Wagner, R. (1977): Democracy in Deficit: The Political Legacy of Lord Keynes. Academic Press. New York, 185p.spa
dc.relation.referencesCourakis, A.S.; Roque-Moura, F. and Tridimas, G. (1993). Public Expenditure Growth. In Greece and Portugal: Wagner´s Law and Beyond. In: Applied Economics, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 125-134.spa
dc.relation.referencesCraigwell, R. (1991). Government deficits and spending in Barbados: An empirical test of the Buchanan-Wagner hypothesis. In: Public Finance, Vol. 46, No. 3, pp. 373-381.spa
dc.relation.referencesChristopoulos, D. and Tsionas, E.G. (2003). Testing the Buchanan-Wagner hypothesis: European evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests. In: Public Choice Vol. 115, No. 3, pp. 439-453.spa
dc.relation.referencesElliot, G.; Rothenberg, T. and Stock, J. (1996). Efficient Tests for an Autoregressive unit root. In: Econometrica, Vol. 64, No. 4, pp. 813-836.spa
dc.relation.referencesFuentes, E. and Barea, J. (1996). El Déficit Público en la Democracia Española. In: Papeles de Economía Española No. 68, pp. 86-191.spa
dc.relation.referencesHernández Garcia, G. (1996). La deuda pública en la democracia. In: Papeles de Economía Española No. 68, pp. 214-227.spa
dc.relation.referencesHondroyiannis, G. and Papapetrou, E. (2001). An investigation of the public deficits and government spending relationship: evidence for Greece. In: Public Choice, Vol. 107, No. 1-2, pp. 169-182.spa
dc.relation.referencesJaén, M. (1999). Gasto público, déficit y cointegración. Un análisis de la hipótesis Buchanan-Wagner en el caso español. In: Hacienda Pública Española Vol. 150, No. 3, p.161-172.spa
dc.relation.referencesJaén, M. (2011). Empirical analysis of Wagner´s law for the Spain´s regions. In: International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences. Vol. 1, No. 1, p. 1-17.spa
dc.relation.referencesJaén, M. and Molina, A. (1997). Un estudio empírico de la ley de Wagner aplicado al caso español. In: Hacienda Pública Española, No. 141-142, pp. 277-285.spa
dc.relation.referencesJaén, M. and Molína, A. (1999). Evidencia Empírica Adicional sobre la Ley de Wagner: España 1901-1992. In: Hacienda Pública Española, No. 148, pp. 169-174.spa
dc.relation.referencesJohansen, S. (1991). Estimation and Hypothesis Testing of Cointegration Vectors in Gaussian Vector Autoagressive Models. In: Econometrica, Vol. 52, No. 6, pp. 1551-80.spa
dc.relation.referencesJohansen, S. and Juselius, K. (1990). Maximun Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration-With Applications to the Demand for Money. In: Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 169-210.spa
dc.relation.referencesJohansen, S. and Juselius, K. (1992). Testing Structural Hypotheses in a Multivariate Cointegration Analysis of the PPP and the UIP for UK. In: Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 53, No. 1-3, pp. 211-244.spa
dc.relation.referencesJohansen, S.; Mosconi, R. and Nielsen, B (2000). Cointegration analysis in the presence of structural breaks in the deterministic trend. In: Econometric Journal, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 216-249.spa
dc.relation.referencesKhan, A. H. (1988). Public Spending and deficits: Evidence from a developing economy. In: Public Finance, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 396-402.spa
dc.relation.referencesKuckuck, J. (2014). Testing Wagner´s Law at different stages of economic development. In: Finanzarchiv/Public Finance Analysis, Vol. 70, No. 1, pp. 128-168.spa
dc.relation.referencesKwiatkowski, D.; Phillips, P.; Schmidt,P. and Shin,Y. (1992). Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationary against the Alternative of a unit root. In: Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 54, No. 1-3, pp. 159-178.spa
dc.relation.referencesLegrenzi, G.; Milas, C (2002). The Role of Omitted Variables in Identifying a Long-run Equilibrium Relationship for the Italian Government Growth. In: International Tax and Public Finance, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 435-449.spa
dc.relation.referencesLilliefors, H (1967). On the Kolmogorv-Smirnov test for normality with mean and variance unknown. In: Journal of the American Statistical Association Vol. 62 pp. 399-402.spa
dc.relation.referencesLumsdaine, R. and D. Papell (1997). Multiple trend breaks and the unit root hypothesis. In: Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 79, No. 2, pp. 212-218.spa
dc.relation.referencesMacKinnon, J, G. (1991). Critical Values for Cointegration Tests, Chapter 13. In: R. F. Engle and C. W. J. Granger (eds.), Long-run Economic Relationships: Readings in Cointegration, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 19p.spa
dc.relation.referencesNg, S. and Perron, P. (2001). Lag Length Selection and the Construction of unit root Tests with Good Size and Power. In: Econometrica, Vol. 69 No. 6, pp. 1519-1554.spa
dc.relation.referencesNiskanen, W. (1978). Deficits, Government Spending and Inflation. What is the Evidence? In: Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 591-602.spa
dc.relation.referencesPerron, P (1989). The Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock and the Unit Root Hypothesis. In: Econometrica, Vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 215-36.spa
dc.relation.referencesPerron, P. and Vogelsand, T. J. (1993). The Great Crash, the Oil Price Shock and the Unit Root Hypothesis: Erratum. In: Econometrica. Vol. 61, No. 1, pp. 248-249spa
dc.relation.referencesPriesmeier, C. and Koester, G. (2012). Does Wagner´s law ruin the sustainability of German public finances? Discussion Paper, No. 8, Deutsche Bundesbank, 48p.spa
dc.relation.referencesProvopoulos, G.A. (1982). Public spending and deficits: The Greek experience. In: Public Finance, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 422-446.spa
dc.relation.referencesRaymond, J.L. and González-Páramo, J.M. (1988). Déficit, Impuestos y Crecimiento del Gasto Público. In: Papeles de Economía Española No. 37. pp. 125-144.spa
dc.relation.referencesSchmidt, P. and Phillips, P.C.B. (1992). LM Test for a Unit Root in the Presence of Deterministic Trends. In: Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 54, No. 3, pp. 257-287.spa
dc.relation.referencesSerrano Sanz, J.M. (1999). Sector Público. Cap. 13. In: J.L. Garcia (dir): Lecciones de Economía Española. Madrid, Ed. Civitas, 4ª ed. Tridimas, G. (1992). Budgetary Deficits and Government Expenditure Growth: Toward a More Accurate Empirical Especification. In: Public Finance Quarterly, Vol. 20, No. 3, p. 275-297.spa
dc.relation.referencesYay, T. and Tastan, H (2009). Growth of Public Expenditures in Turkey during the 1950-2004 Period: an Econometric Analysis. In: Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, No. 4, pp. 101-118spa
dc.relation.referencesZivot, E. and Andrews, K. (1992). Further Evidence On The Great Crash, The Oil Price Shock, and The Unit Root Hypothesis. In: Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, Vol. 10, No. 10, pp. 251–70.spa
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.sourceSemestre Económico Universidad de Medellín; Vol. 19, núm. 40 (2016); 17-52spa
dc.source2248-4345spa
dc.source0120-6346spa
dc.subjectPublic expenditurespa
dc.subjectgross domestic productspa
dc.subjectunit rootspa
dc.subjectcointegrationspa
dc.subjectbreak points.spa
dc.subjectGasto públicospa
dc.subjectproducto interior brutospa
dc.subjectraíz unitariaspa
dc.subjectcointegraciónspa
dc.subjectpuntos de rupturaspa
dc.subjectGasto públicospa
dc.subjectproduto interno brutospa
dc.subjectraiz unitáriaspa
dc.subjectco-integraçãospa
dc.subjectpontos de ruptura.spa
dc.titleGasto público y déficit fiscal en España (1958-2014)spa
dc.title.alternativeDespesa pública e do défice em Espanha (1958-2014)por
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
Semestre_Economico_296.pdf
Tamaño:
1.02 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Descargar

Colecciones

Semestre Económico Vol. 19, núm. 40 (2016)