Análisis de la opinión de los hogares sobre la gestión de los residuos sólidos domiciliarios en Bogotá

dc.audienceComunidad Universidad de Medellínspa
dc.contributor.authorBarbosa Camargo, Maria Ines
dc.contributor.authorSalazar Sarmiento, Alejandra
dc.contributor.authorPeñaloza Gómez, Kelly Jhohana
dc.coverage.spatialLat: 06 15 00 N degrees minutes Lat: 6.2500 decimal degreesLong: 075 36 00 W degrees minutes Long: -75.6000 decimal degrees
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-22T21:07:59Z
dc.date.available2021-12-22T21:07:59Z
dc.date.issued2019-10-01
dc.descriptionHacer un análisis sobre la opinión que los hogares tienen de la gestión de los residuos sólidos en su ciudad, permite enfocar las estrategias de intervención para lograr los objetivos de política. Este documento presenta los hallazgos sobre la opinión de los hogares localizados en la zona que operaba hasta inicios de 2018 la empresa Aguas de Bogotá S. A. ESP, sobre la gestión de los residuos sólidos domiciliarios. Se utiliza la estadística descriptiva, se aplicaron 384 encuestas. Se concluye que hay una tendencia en la ciudad a la falta de gobernanza ambiental y se hace necesaria una masificación de la sensibilización sobre la importancia de hacer separación en fuente y el uso adecuado de los contenedores y de las bolsas plásticas.spa
dc.description.abstractAnalyzing the opinion at homes on the management of solid residues in your city allows the na-rrowing of the intervention strategies for the achieving of political goals. This document presents the findings on the opinion about the management of solid home residues of homes located in the areas in which the company Aguas de Bogotá S. A. ESP operated until the beginnings of 2018. This article concludes that in the city there is a tendency inclined towards the lack of environmental governance and that a massification of the sensitization about the importance of separating in the source is necessary, as well as adequate use of bags and containers.eng
dc.format.extentp. 53-75spa
dc.format.mediumElectrónicospa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypePDF
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.22395/seec.v22n53a3
dc.identifier.eissn2248-4345
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad de Medellínspa
dc.identifier.issn0120-6346
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellínspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.udem.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11407/6792
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad de Medellínspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias Económicas y Administrativasspa
dc.publisher.placeMedellínspa
dc.relation.citationendpage75
dc.relation.citationissue53
dc.relation.citationstartpage53
dc.relation.citationvolume23
dc.relation.haspartSemestre Económico, Vol. 22 Núm. 52 octubre-diciembre 2019spa
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSemestre Económico, Vol. 23 Núm. 53 (2019)spa
dc.relation.referencesAbounoori, Esmaiel, Elmi, Zahra, y Nademi, Younes. (2016). Forecasting Tehran stock Exchange volatility, Markow switching GARCH approach, En: Physica A, N°. 445, p. 264-282. Doi:10.1016/j.physa.2015.10.024
dc.relation.referencesAloui, Chaker y Mabrouk, Samir. (2010). Value-at-risk estimations of energy commodities via long-memory, asymmetry and fat-tailed GARCH models. En: Energy Policy, N°. 38, p. 2326 2339.Doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2009.12.020
dc.relation.referencesAndersen, Torben, Benzoni, Luca y Lund, Jesper. (2002). An empirical investigation of continuous- -time equity return models. En: Journal of Finance, Vol. 57, N°. 3, p. 1239-1284. Doi:10.1111/1540-6261.00460
dc.relation.referencesAngelidis, Timotheos, Benos, Alexandros y Degiannakis, Stavros. (2004). The use of GARCH models in VaR estimation. En: Statistical Methodology, N°. 1, p. 105-128.
dc.relation.referencesAssaf, Ata. (2015). Value-at-Risk analysis in the MENA equity markets: Fat tails and conditional asymmetries in return distributions. En: Journal of Multinational Financial Management, N°. 29, p. 30-45. Doi: 10.1016/j.mulfin.2014.11.002
dc.relation.referencesBayer, Sebastian. (2018). Combining Value-at-Risk forecasts using penalized quantile Regressions, En: Econometrics and Statistics, N°. 8, p. 56-77.
dc.relation.referencesBentes, Sónia. (2014). Measuring persistence in stock market volatility using the FIGARCH approach. En: Physica A, N°. 408, p. 190-197. Doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2014.04.032
dc.relation.referencesBollerslev, Tim. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. En: Journal of Econometrics, N°. 31, p. 307-327. Doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1
dc.relation.referencesBollerslev, T. (1987). A conditionally heteroscedastic time series model for speculative prices and rates of return. En: Review of Economics and Statistics, N°. 69, p. 542-547.
dc.relation.referencesCastaño, Elkin,. Gómez, Karoll y Gallón, Santiago (2008). Pronóstico y estructuras de volatilidad multiperíodo de la tasa de cambio del peso colombiano. En: Cuadernos de Economía, Vol. XXVII, No. 48, p. 241-266
dc.relation.referencesCheong, Chin Wen. (2008). Heavy-tailed value-at-risk analysis for Malaysian stock exchange. En: Physica A, N°. 387, p. 4285-4298. Doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2008.01.075
dc.relation.referencesCheong, Chin Wen. (2009). Modeling and forecasting crude oil markets using ARCH-type models. En: Energy Policy, N°. 37, p. 2346-2355. Doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.02.026
dc.relation.referencesChiu, Yen-Chen y Chuang, I-Yuan. (2016). The performance of the switching forecast model of value-at-risk in the Asian stock markets. En: Finance Research Letters, N°. 18, p. 43-51. Doi:10.1016/j.frl.2016.03.019
dc.relation.referencesComité de Supervisión Bancaria de Basilea (BCBS) (2019). Minimum capital requirements for market risk. Suiza: BCBS.
dc.relation.referencesDegiannakis, Stavros y Potamia, Artemis. (2017). Multiple-days-ahead value-at-risk and expected shortfall forecasting for stock indices, commodities and exchange rates: Inter-day versus intra-day data. En: International Review of Financial Analysis, N°: 49, p. 176-190. Doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2016.10.008
dc.relation.referencesDelgado, Luis David y Durango, María Patricia (2018). Estructuración de un portafolio de inversiones con acciones colombianas, En: Semestre Económico, Vol. 21, N°. 46, p. 167-183. Doi: 10.22395/seec.v21n46a7.
dc.relation.referencesDiamandis, Panayiotis, Drakos, Anastassios, Kouretas, Georgios y Zarangas, Leonidas. (2011). Value-at-risk for long and short trading positions: Evidence from developed and emerging equity markets. En: International Review of Financial Analysis, N°. 20, p. 165-176. Doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2011.02.009
dc.relation.referencesDimitrakopoulos, Dimitris, Kavussanos, Manolis y Spyrou, Spyros. (2010). Value at risk models for volatile emerging markets equity portfolios. En: The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, N°. 50, p. 515-526. Doi: 10.1016/j.qref.2010.06.006
dc.relation.referencesDowd, Kevin y Blake, David. (2006). After Var: the theory, estimation and insurance applications of quantile-based risk measures. En: The Journal of Risk and Insurance, Vol. 73, N°. 2, p. 193-229. Doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6975.2006.00171.x
dc.relation.referencesEngle, Robert. (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. En: Econométrica, Vol. 50, N°. 4, p. 987-1007.
dc.relation.referencesEwing, Bradley y Malik, Farroq. (2017). Modelling asymmetric volatility in oil prices under structural breaks. En: Energy Economics, N°. 63, p. 227-233. Doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.03.001
dc.relation.referencesFan, Ying, Zhang, Yue-Jung, Tsai, Hsien-Tang, y Wei, Yi-Ming. (2008). Estimating Value at Risk of crude oil price and its spillover effect using the GED-GARCH approach. En: Energy Economics, N°. 30, p. 3156-3171 Doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2008.04.002
dc.relation.referencesGallant, Ronald, Hsieh, David y Tauchen, George. (1997). Estimation of stochastic volatility models with diagnostics. En: Journal of Econometrics, N°. 81, p. 159-192.
dc.relation.referencesGiot, Pierre y Laurent, Sébastien. (2004). Modelling daily Value-at-Risk using realized volatility and ARCH type models. En: Journal of Empirical Finance, N°. 11, p. 379 398. Doi: 10.1016/j.jempfin.2003.04.003
dc.relation.referencesGonzaléz-Rivera, Gloria, Lee, Tae-Hwy, y Mishra, Santosh. (2004). Forecasting volatility: A reality check based on option pricing, utility function, value-at-risk, and predictive likelihood. En: International Journal of Forecasting, N°. 20, p.629 -645. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2003.10.003
dc.relation.referencesHartz, Christoph, Mittnik, Stefan, y Paolella, Marc. (2006). Accurate value-at-risk forecasting based on the normal-GARCH model, En: Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, N°. 51, p. 2295-2312.
dc.relation.referencesHull, John, White, Alan. (1998). Incorporating volatility updating into the historical simulation method for VaR. En: The Journal of Risk, N°. 1, p. 5-19.
dc.relation.referencesJorion, P. (2000). Valor en Riesgo: El nuevo paradigma para el control de riesgos con derivados. México, D.F.: Limusa.
dc.relation.referencesKupiec, Paul. (1995). Techniques for verifying the accuracy of risk measurement models. En: The Journal of Derivatives, Vol. 3, N°. 2, p. 73-84. Doi: 10.3905/jod.1995.407942.
dc.relation.referencesKuri, K., Ojeda, C., y Ovalle, D. (2015). Modelación de la serie de retornos diarios de la acción de ecopetrol en el periodo: 27/noviembre/2007-25/noviembre/2013. En: Heurística, N°. 17, p. 51-57.
dc.relation.referencesLaporta, Alessandro, Merlo, Luca y Petrella, Lea. (2018). Selection of Value at Risk Models for Energy Commodities, En: Energy Economics, N°. 74, p.628 643. Doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2018.07.009
dc.relation.referencesMabrouk, Samir. (2016). Forecasting daily conditional volatility and h-step-ahead short and long Value-at-Risk accuracy: Evidence from financial data. En:The Journal of Finance and Data Science, N°. 2, p. 136-151. Doi: 10.1016/j.jfds.2016.06.001
dc.relation.referencesMabrouk, Samir y Saadi, Samir. (2012). Parametric Value-at-Risk analysis: Evidence from stock indices. En: The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, N°. 52, p. 305-321. Doi: 10.1016/j.qref.2012.04.006
dc.relation.referencesMarkovitz, Harry. (1952). Portfolio selection. En: The Journal of Finance, Vol. 7, N°. 1, p. 77-91.
dc.relation.referencesMendoza, Alfonso y Galvanovskis, Evalds (2014). La cópula GED bivariada. Una aplicación en entornos de crisis. En: El Trimestre Económico, Vol. 81, No. 323, p.721-746.
dc.relation.referencesNelson, Daniel. (1991). Conditional heteroscedasticity in asset returns: a new approach, En: Econometrica, N°. 59, p. 347-370.
dc.relation.referencesOspina D´Aleman, Federico y Giraldo Sánchez, David. (2009). Aplicación de los modelos GARCH a la estimacion del VaR de acciones colombianas. En: Soluciones de Postgrado EIA, N° 3. p. 11-24.
dc.relation.referencesPérez, Fredy y Fernández, Horacio. (2006). Análisis de la volatilidad del índice general de la bolsa de valores de Colombia utilizando modelos ARCH, En: Revista Ingenierías Universidad de Medellín, Vol. 5, N°. 8, p. 13-33.
dc.relation.referencesPino, Anderson, Uribe, Jorge Mario, y Jiménez, Diana. (2017). Relevancia de los inversionistas institucionales en el mercado accionario colombiano. Semestre Económico, Vol. 20, n°. 44, p. 45-65. Doi: 10.22395/seec.v20n44a3.
dc.relation.referencesReboredo, Juan, Rivera-Castro, Miguel y Ugolini, Andrea. (2016). Downside and upside risk spillovers between exchange rates and stock prices. En: Journal of Banking & Finance, N°. 62, p.76-96.
dc.relation.referencesRivera, David. (2009). Modelación del efecto del día de la semana para los índices accionarios de Colombia mediante un modelo STAR GARCH. En: Revista de Economía del Rosario, Vol. 12 N°. 1, p. 1-24.
dc.relation.referencesSadegui, Mehdi y Shavvalpour, Saeed. (2006). Energy risk management and value at risk modeling, En: Energy Policy, N°. 34, p. 3367-3373.
dc.relation.referencesSadorsky, Perry. (2014). Modeling volatility and correlations between emerging market stock prices and the prices of copper, oil and wheat. En: Energy Economics, N°. 43, p. 72-81. Doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2014.02.014
dc.relation.referencesSchaeffer, Roberto, Borba, Bruno, Rathmann, Régis, Szklo, Alexandre y Castelo-Branco, David. (2012). Dow Jones sustainability index transmission to oil stock market returns: A GARCH approach, En: Energy, N°. 45, p.933-943.
dc.relation.referencesSlim, Skander, Koubaa, Yosra y BenSaida, Ahmed. (2017). Value-at-Risk under Lévy GARCH models: Evidence from global stock markets. En: Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, N°. 46, p. 30-53. Doi: 10.1016/j.intfin.2016.08.008
dc.relation.referencesSo, Mike y Yu, Philip. (2006). Empirical analysis of GARCH models in value at risk estimation. International. En: Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, N°. 16, p. 180-197.
dc.relation.referencesSu, Ender y Knowles, Thomas. (2006). Asian Pacific stock market volatility modeling and value at risk analysis. En: Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, N°. 42, p. 18-62.
dc.relation.referencesSu, Jung Bin. (2015). Value-at-risk estimates of the stock indices in developed and emerging markets including the spillover effects of currency market. En: Economic Modelling, N°. 46, p. 204-224. Doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2014.12.022
dc.relation.referencesSu, Jung-Bin y Hung, Jui-Cheng. (2011). Empirical analysis of jump dynamics, heavy-tails and skewness on value-at-risk estimation. En: Economic Modelling, N°. 28, p. 1117-1130.
dc.relation.referencesSu, Jung-Bin, Lee, Ming-Chih, y Chiu, Chien-Liang (2014). Why does skewness and the fat-tail effect influence value-at-risk estimates? Evidence from alternative capital markets. En: International Review of Economics and Finance, N°.31, 59 85. Doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2013.12.001
dc.relation.referencesTang, Ta Lun y Shieh, Shwu-Jane. (2006). Long memory in stock index futures markets: A value--at-risk approach. En: Physica A, N°: 366, p. 437-448. Doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2005.10.017
dc.relation.referencesUribe, Jorge Mario. (2007). Caracterización del mercado accionario colombiano, 2001-2006: un análisis comparativo. En: Borradores de Economía, N°. 456, p. 1-35.
dc.relation.referencesWong, Zhen Yao, Chin, Wen Cheon y Tan, Siow Hooi. (2016). Daily value-at-risk modeling and forecast evaluation: The realized volatility approach. En: The Journal of Finance and Data Science, Vol. 2, N°. 3, p.171-187.
dc.relation.referencesYang, Yung-Lieh y Chang, Chia-Lin. (2008). A double-threshold GARCH model of stock market and currency shocks on stock returns, En: Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, N°. 79, p. 458-474.
dc.relation.referencesYoussef, Manel, Belkacem, Lotfi y Mokni, Khaled. (2015). Value-at-Risk estimation of energy commodities: A long-memory GARCH EVT approach. En: Energy Economics, N°. p. 51, 99-110. Doi: 10.1016/j.eneco.2015.06.010
dc.relation.referencesZakoian, Jean Michel. (1994). Threshold heteroskedastic models, En: Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Vol. 18, N°. 5, p. 931-955. Doi: 10.1016/0165-1889(94)90039-6
dc.relation.urihttps://revistas.udem.edu.co/index.php/economico/article/view/3032
dc.rights.creativecommonsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0*
dc.sourceSemestre Económico, Vol. 22 Núm. 53 (2019): octubre-diciembre, 53-75
dc.subjectResiduos sólidosspa
dc.subjectReciclajespa
dc.subjectInstitucionesspa
dc.subjectDesarrollo sosteniblespa
dc.subject.proposalSolid residueseng
dc.subject.proposalReciclagempor
dc.subject.proposalInstituiçõespor
dc.subject.proposalSustainable developmenteng
dc.titleAnálisis de la opinión de los hogares sobre la gestión de los residuos sólidos domiciliarios en Bogotáspa
dc.title.portugueseAnálise da opinião dos lares sobre a gestão dos resíduos sólidos residenciais em Bogotápor
dc.typeArticle
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.localArtículo científicospa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Semestre_Economico_417.pdf
Tamaño:
880.64 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
1.16 KB
Formato:
Plain Text
Descripción: