Individual learning in organisational learning contexts: A literature review

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.affiliationGuerra-Gómez J., Business Administration Department, Medellín University, Antioquia, Colombia
dc.contributor.affiliationPérez-Sánchez E.O., Universidad de Medellín, Medellín, Colombia
dc.contributor.authorGuerra-Gómez J.
dc.contributor.authorPérez-Sánchez E.O.
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-08T14:23:49Z
dc.date.available2025-09-08T14:23:49Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.descriptionBackground: This study consists of a literature review of scientific publications related to being, knowing and doing as components of individual learning in organizational contexts. Objective: This literature review aims to analyze the relationships between being, knowing and doing as components of organizational learning, as well as the different theoretical perspectives that involve them. It is also intended to identify the evolution of mentioned components and gaps in theories in order to recommend future directions for research. Methods: It begins with a bibliometric analysis combined with a systematic review. First, a metadata review is performed with the help of VosViewer. Subsequently, using the PRISMA statement for the systematic review, the search is refined and a content analysis is performed. Results: More research focused on strengthening individual learning and experiential learning as a contribution to the field of organizational learning is needed. An important relationship between being, knowing and doing with organizational learning theory is also identified. Knowledge management, know-how and context emerge as new theoretical elements or as part of the theories analyzed. Conclusions: This research enriches existing knowledge by demonstrating that, despite the evident relationship between being, knowing and doing in knowledge construction, these components are not considered in individual and organizational knowledge planning indicating the need to study them further. © The Author(s) 2025.
dc.identifier.doi10.3233/HSM-230214
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad de Medellínspa
dc.identifier.issn1672533
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellínspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.udem.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11407/9109
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias Económicas y Administrativasspa
dc.publisher.programAdministración de Empresasspa
dc.relation.citationendpage19
dc.relation.citationissue1
dc.relation.citationstartpage6
dc.relation.citationvolume44
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-105003110456&doi=10.3233%2fHSM-230214&partnerID=40&md5=cbf7b714b9108863bfcd9309db4df3e0
dc.relation.referencesCrossan M.M., Lane H.W., White R.E., An Organisational Learning Framework: From Intuition to Institution, Acad Manag Rev, 24, 3, pp. 522-537, (1999)
dc.relation.referencesCarlucci D., Schiuma G., Knowledge asset value spiral: linking knowledge assets to company’s performance, Knowl Process Mgmt, 13, pp. 35-46, (2006)
dc.relation.referencesRicciardi F., Cantino V., Rossignoli C., Organisational learning for the common good: an emerging model, Knowl Manag Res Pract [Internet], 19, 3, pp. 277-290, (2021)
dc.relation.referencesAbubakar M.A., Hamzah E., Maher Ahmad A., Alev E., Knowledge management, decision-making style and organisational performance, J Innov Knowl, 4, 2, pp. 104-114, (2019)
dc.relation.referencesSen A.K., (2002)
dc.relation.referencesSen A., On ethics and economics, (1999)
dc.relation.referencesObeso M., Hernandez-Linares R., Lopez-Fernandez M.C., Serrano-Bedia A.M., Knowledge management processes and organisational performance: the mediating role of organisational learning, J Knowledge Manage, 24, 8, pp. 1859-1880, (2020)
dc.relation.referencesAsiaei K., Bontis N., Alizadeh R., Yaghoubi M., Green intellectual capital and environmental management accounting: Natural resource orchestration in favor of environmental performance, Bus Strateg Environ, 31, 1, pp. 76-93, (2022)
dc.relation.referencesGairin Sallan J., La Evaluación del Impacto en Programas de Formación, REICE. Rev Iberoam sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educ, 8, 5, pp. 19-43, (2010)
dc.relation.referencesArici H.E., Uysal M., Leadership, green innovation, and green creativity_ a systematic review _ Enhanced Reader, Serv Ind J [Internet], 42, pp. 280-320, (2022)
dc.relation.referencesCanbaloglu G., Treur J., Equilibrium analysis for linear and nonlinear aggregation in network models: applied to mental model aggregation in multilevel organisational learning, J Inf Telecommun, 6, 3, pp. 289-340, (2022)
dc.relation.referencesAlvarez Cedillo J.A., Alvarez Sanchez T., Sandoval Gomez R.J., Aguilar Fernandez M., 9, 18
dc.relation.referencesKhan S.H., Majid A., Yasir M., Javed A., Social capital and business model innovation in SMEs: do organisational learning capabilities and entrepreneurial orientation really matter?, Eur J Innov. Manage, 24, 1, pp. 191-212, (2021)
dc.relation.referencesKim E., Park S., Transformational leadership, knowledge sharing, organisational climate and learning: an empirical study, Leadersh Organ Dev J, 41, 6, pp. 761-775, (2020)
dc.relation.referencesMartinez-Martinez A., Cegarra-Navarro J.-G., Garcia-Perez A., Sustainability knowledge management and organisational learning in tourism: Current approaches and areas for future development, J Sustain Tour, 31, 4, pp. 895-907, (2023)
dc.relation.referencesAcevedo J., Diaz-Molina I., Learning organizations in emerging economies: the effect of knowledge management on innovative culture in Chilean companies, Learn Organ, 30, 1, pp. 37-54, (2023)
dc.relation.referencesArgote L., Knowledge Transfer Within Organizations: Mechanisms, Motivation, and Consideration, Annu Rev Psychol, (2023)
dc.relation.referencesBernal-Torres C.A., Amaya N., Gomez-Santos L., Mojica-Macias J.P., Sierra-Parra D., Interrelation Between the Dynamic Capabilities of Knowledge Management, Learning, Adaptation, with Innovation in Medium and Large Companies in an Emerging Economy in Times of Pandemic, Global Business Review, (2023)
dc.relation.referencesLi H., An H., Wang Y., Huang J., Gao X., Evolutionary features of academic articles co-keyword network and keywords co-occurrence network: Based on two-mode affiliation network, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 450, pp. 657-669, (2016)
dc.relation.referencesGhasemi A.A., Yazdani H., Mozaheb M.A., The role of metacognitive strategy training in fostering vocabulary acquisition, Learn Teach High Educ Gulf Perspect, 16, 1, pp. 45-57, (2019)
dc.relation.referencesJo Y., Hong A.J., Impact of Agile Learning on Innovative Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model of Employee Engagement and Perceived Organisational Support, Front Psychol, 13, (2022)
dc.relation.referencesFigueiredo R., Ferreira J., Camargo E., Dorokhov O., Applying deep learning to predict innovations in small and medium enterprises (SMEs): the dark side of knowledge management risk, VINE J Inf Knowl Manag Syst, 53, 5, pp. 941-962, (2023)
dc.relation.referencesNonaka L., Takeuchi H., Umemoto K., A Theory of Organisational Knowledge Creation, Int J Technol Manage, 11, pp. 833-845, (1996)
dc.relation.referencesBennet A., Bennet D., Organisational Survival in the New World, Routledge, (2003)
dc.relation.referencesCastaneda D.I., Manrique L.F., Cuellar S., Is organisational learning being absorbed by knowledge management? A systematic review, J Knowledge Manage, 22, 2, pp. 299-325, (2018)
dc.relation.referencesVisser M., Van Eck N.J., Waltman L., Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic [Data set], Zenodo, (2020)
dc.relation.referencesAnand A., Brix J., The learning organization and organisational learning in the public sector: A review and research agenda, The Learning Organization, 29, 2, pp. 129-156, (2022)
dc.relation.referencesMoher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., Altman D.G., Ítems de referencia para publicar Revisiones Sistemáticas y Metaanálisis: La Declaración PRISMA, Rev Española De Nutr Humana Y Dietética, 18, 3, pp. 172-181, (2014)
dc.relation.referencesAlQudah N., Knowledge sharing and innovation in business organisation: A literature review, Human Systems Management, 42, 5, pp. 471-485, (2023)
dc.relation.referencesCyert R., March J., A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, (1963)
dc.relation.referencesCangelosi V.E., Dill W.R., Organisational Learning Observations: Toward a Theory, Administrative Science Quarterly, 10, 2, pp. 175-203, (1965)
dc.relation.referencesArgyris C., Schon D.A., Organisational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, Reis, 77-78, pp. 345-348, (1997)
dc.relation.referencesMarch J.G., Ambiguity and the Engineering of Choice, International Studies of Management & Organization, 9, 3, pp. 9-39, (1979)
dc.relation.referencesDuncan R., Weiss A., Aprendizaje Organizacional: Implicaciones para el Diseño Organizacional, Investigación en Comportamiento Organizacional, 1, pp. 75-123, (1979)
dc.relation.referencesAmponsen H., Organisational Learning through Internal Systems, Strategic Alliances and Networks, Doctoral Thesis. Queen's University at Kingston, Canada, (1991)
dc.relation.referencesDodgson M., Organisational Learning: A Review of Some Literatures, Organization Studies, 14, 3, pp. 375-394, (1993)
dc.relation.referencesChang W.J., Liao S.H., Wu T.-T., Relationships among Organisational Culture, Knowledge Sharing, and Innovation Capability: A Case of the Automobile Industry in Taiwan, Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 15, pp. 471-490, (2017)
dc.relation.referencesLopez Zapata E., (2014)
dc.relation.referencesLi X., Qiang Q., Huang L., Huang C., How Knowledge Sharing Affects Business Model Innovation: An Empirical Study from the Perspective of Ambidextrous Organisational Learning, Sustainability, 14, 10, (2022)
dc.relation.referencesShi Q., Wang Q., Guo Z., Knowledge sharing in the construction supply chain: Collaborative innovation activities and BIM application on innovation performance, Eng Constr Archit Manag, 147, 12, (2021)
dc.relation.referencesKassaneh T.C., Bolisani E., Cegarra-Navarro J.-G., Knowledge management practices for sustainable supply chain management: A challenge for business education, Sustainability, 13, 5, (2021)
dc.relation.referencesLin C.Y., Huang C.K., Ko C.J., The impact of perceived enjoyment on team effectiveness and individual learning in a blended learning business course: The mediating effect of knowledge sharing, Australas J Educ Technol, 36, 1, pp. 126-141, (2020)
dc.relation.referencesGomez-Duque L., Daza-Torres J., Arias-Perez J., Inteligencia de negocios y agilidad organizacional: ¿Son relevantes la toma de decisiones racional e intuitiva?, Estudios Gerenciales, 39, 167, pp. 181-191, (2023)
dc.relation.referencesBilanski G.
dc.relation.referencesFerreira J., Mueller J., Papa A., Strategic knowledge management: theory, practice and future challenges, J Knowledge Manage, 24, 2, pp. 121-126, (2020)
dc.relation.referencesJain A.K., Moreno A., Organisational Learning, Knowledge Management Practices and Firm’s Performance: An Empirical Study of a Heavy Engineering Firm in India, Journal of Technology Management, 22, pp. 14-39, (2015)
dc.relation.referencesAlmahamid S., Mcadams A., Al Kalaldeh T., Mo'taz A., The relationship between perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, perceived information quality, and intention to use e-government, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, (2010)
dc.relation.referencesYi Y., Chen Y., Li D., Stakeholder ties, organisational learning, and business model innovation: A business ecosystem perspective, Technovation, 114, (2022)
dc.relation.referencesMartinez-Crespo J., Lopez-Arellano H., Model design for knowledge management and organisational learning for business schools, International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 16, 2, pp. 117-144, (2019)
dc.relation.referencesKoo Y., Kim S.J., Song J.H., The moderating effect of communication on congruence and incongruence of openness to change: is communication always beneficial for learning organization culture and knowledge sharing?, The Learning Organization, 29, 2, pp. 172-190, (2022)
dc.relation.referencesMoreira M.T.V., Mendoza G.K.Z., Martinez M.E.M., Gamez M.R., Learning and printing the brain, ijssh [Internet], 4, 1, pp. 23-32, (2020)
dc.relation.referencesOrtega-Fernandez A., Martin-Rojas R., Garcia-Morales V.J., Artificial intelligence in the urban environment: Smart cities as models for developing innovation and sustainability, Sustainability, 12, 19, (2020)
dc.relation.referencesSteiman J., Del divorcio al matrimonio igualitario: teoría y práctica en la formación universitaria, VDLE [Internet], 1, 1
dc.relation.referencesLee J., Jin M., Understanding the organisational learning culture—Innovative behavior relation in local government: The roles of knowledge sharing and job autonomy, Public Administration, (2022)
dc.relation.referencesBettiol M., Capestro M., Di Maria E., Micelli S., Knowledge and digital strategies in manufacturing firms: the experience of top performers. En: Knowledge Management and Industry 4.0, New Paradigms for Value Creation, pp. 85-111, (2020)
dc.relation.referencesCancado A., Tenorio F., Pereira J., (2019)
dc.relation.referencesScharmer C.O., (2017)
dc.relation.referencesRoque V., Arriaga A., The effect of leadership, organisational learning, and knowledge management on the perception of innovation by operational personnel in Mexico City, Contaduría y administración, 64, 3, pp. 1-25, (2019)
dc.relation.referencesZhou Z., Liu Y., Yu H., Ren L., The influence of machine learning-based knowledge management model on enterprise organisational capability innovation and industrial development, PLoS ONE, 15, 12, (2020)
dc.relation.referencesSenge P.M., (1990)
dc.relation.referencesRajiani I., Normuslim N., Knowledge management and organisational learning to improve the organisational performance of mines in Indonesia, Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 7, 2, (2023)
dc.relation.referencesSerenko A., A structured literature review of scientometric research of the knowledge management discipline: a 2021 update, Journal of Knowledge Management, 25, 8, pp. 1889-1925, (2021)
dc.relation.referencesZhang J., Jiang H., Wu R., Li J., Reconciling the Dilemma of Knowledge Sharing: A Network Pluralism Framework of Firms’ R&D Alliance Network and Innovation Performance, Journal of Management, 45, 7, pp. 2635-2665, (2019)
dc.rights.accesoRestricted access
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.sourceHuman Systems Management
dc.sourceHum Syst Manage
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectContext
dc.subjectIndividual learning
dc.subjectKnowledge management
dc.subjectOrganisational learning
dc.subjectAdversarial machine learning
dc.subjectContrastive Learning
dc.subjectBibliometrics analysis
dc.subjectContent analysis
dc.subjectContext
dc.subjectIndividual learning
dc.subjectLearning context
dc.subjectLiterature reviews
dc.subjectOrganizational context
dc.subjectOrganizational learning
dc.subjectScientific publications
dc.subjectSystematic Review
dc.subjectFederated learning
dc.titleIndividual learning in organisational learning contexts: A literature review
dc.typeArticle
dc.type.localArtículospa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Archivos

Colecciones

Indexados Scopus