Evaluating the socio-economic drivers of household adoption of biodigester systems for domestic energy in rural Colombia

dc.contributor.affiliationLuna-delRisco M., Universidad de Medellín, Carrera 87 No. 30-65, Antioquia, Medellin, 050030, Colombia
dc.contributor.affiliationArrieta González C., Universidad de Medellín, Carrera 87 No. 30-65, Antioquia, Medellin, 050030, Colombia
dc.contributor.affiliationMendoza-Hernández S., Universidad de Medellín, Carrera 87 No. 30-65, Antioquia, Medellin, 050030, Colombia
dc.contributor.affiliationVanegas-Trujillo E., Universidad de Medellín, Carrera 87 No. 30-65, Antioquia, Medellin, 050030, Colombia
dc.contributor.affiliationda Rocha Meneses L., Chair of Biosystems Engineering, Institute of Forestry and Engineering, Estonian University of Life Sciences, 56 Fr. R. Kreutzwald Str., Tartu, 51006, Estonia
dc.contributor.affiliationRio J.S.-D., Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano. Department of Mechatronics Engineering – MATyER, Medellín, Colombia
dc.contributor.affiliationCastillo-Meza L.E., Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana – Seccional Bucaramanga, Department of Environmental Engineering, 680002, Colombia
dc.contributor.affiliationSantos-Ballardo D.U., Laboratorio de ecotoxicología, Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo A.C. Unidad Mazatlán., Av. Sábalo Cerritos S/N, Sinaloa, Mazatlán, 82112, Mexico
dc.contributor.affiliationGómez Montoya J.P., Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica, Universidad Tecnológica del Perú, Lima, Peru
dc.contributor.authorLuna-delRisco M.; Arrieta González C.; Mendoza-Hernández S.; Vanegas-Trujillo E.; da Rocha Meneses L.; Rio J.S.-D.; Castillo-Meza L.E.; Santos-Ballardo D.U.; Gómez Montoya J.P.
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-28T22:10:48Z
dc.date.available2025-04-28T22:10:48Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.descriptionThis study examines the socio-economic factors influencing rural households in Colombia to adopt biogas technologies, emphasizing their role in promoting sustainable development and environmental commitment. The research investigates social factors such as technology perception, capacity building, and reliance on technology. Economic factors like initial investment, operating and maintenance costs, energy savings, return on investment, by-product revenue, government incentives, alternative solution costs, financial risks, and market demand are also considered. Despite the socio-economic benefits of biodigesters, barriers such as training deficiencies, regulatory issues, and sustainability challenges delay their widespread adoption. Concerns about operational reliability, costs, and maintenance further slow their acceptance. The research presents an economic model with a viability score based on economic variables correlated with regional GDP to evaluate the capacity of Colombian regions to support biodigester technology. Government support iarestrategic regions with abundant biomass and favourable economic conditions is highlighted as fundamental for promoting biogas technology in rural Colombia. © 2024 Elsevier Ltd
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.seta.2024.104146
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad de Medellínspa
dc.identifier.issn22131388
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellínspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.udem.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11407/8908
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ingenieríasspa
dc.publisher.programIngeniería en Energíaspa
dc.relation.citationvolume73
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85212589480&doi=10.1016%2fj.seta.2024.104146&partnerID=40&md5=dd427e32efafd3b8315b4ffd977ff1e6
dc.relation.referencesViviana M., Castillo O.L., Colombian energy planning – neither for energy, nor for Colombia, Energy Policy, 129, pp. 1132-1142, (2019)
dc.relation.referencesCarvajal-Romo G., Valderrama-Mendoza M., Rodriguez-Urrego D., Rodriguez-Urrego L., Assessment of solar and wind energy potential in La Guajira, Colombia: current status, and future prospects, Sustain Energy Technol Assess, 36, (2019)
dc.relation.referencesReina-Bermudez E., Hernandez-Carvajal O.M.
dc.relation.referencesValencia-Marquez D., Ortiz-Munguia J.A., Maldonado-Lopez E., Quintana-Hernandez P.A., Louvier-Hernandez J.F., Fuentes-Cortes L.F., Multi-objective and machine learning strategies for addressing the Water–Energy–Waste nexus in the design of energy systems, Sustain Energy Technol Assess, 60, (2023)
dc.relation.referencesDuarah P., Haldar D., Patel A.K., Di Dong C., Singhania R.R., Purkait M.K., A review on global perspectives of sustainable development in bioenergy generation, Bioresour Technol, 348, (2022)
dc.relation.referencesObaideen K., Et al., Biogas role in achievement of the sustainable development goals: evaluation, challenges, and guidelines, J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng, 131, (2022)
dc.relation.referencesHenao F., Cherni J.A., Jaramillo P., Dyner I., A multicriteria approach to sustainable energy supply for the rural poor, Eur J Oper Res, 218, 3, pp. 801-809, (2012)
dc.relation.referencesSoler-Villamizar J.P., Rankin A.J., Energías comunitarias para la transición justa, Gestión y Ambiente, 24, Supl 2, pp. 252-266, (2022)
dc.relation.referencesMartinez Vallejo L.A., Hernandez Pardo M.A., Benavides Piracon J.A., Belalcazar Ceron L.C., Molina Achury N.J., Exposure levels to PM2.5 and black carbon for people with disabilities in rural homes of Colombia, Environ Monit Assess, 193, 1, (2021)
dc.relation.referencesPerez G., Islas-Samperio J.M., Grande-Acosta G.K., Manzini F., Socioeconomic and environmental aspects of traditional firewood for cooking on the example of rural and peri-urban Mexican households, Energies, 15, 13, (2022)
dc.relation.referencesTECSOL, Estimation of the biomass potential for conversion into biogas in Colombia and its use (Estimación del potencial de conversión a biogás de la biomasa en Colombia y su aprovechamiento), Bogotá, (2018)
dc.relation.referencesZapata S., Castaneda M., Jimenez M., Julian Aristizabal A., Franco C.J., Dyner I., Long-term effects of 100% renewable generation on the Colombian power market, Sustain Energy Technol Assess, 30, pp. 183-191, (2018)
dc.relation.referencesDuran Contreras M., Sequeda Barros R., Zapata J., Vanegas Chamorro M., Albis Arrieta A., A look to the biogas generation from organic wastes in Colombia, Int J Energy Econ Policy, 10, pp. 248-254, (2020)
dc.relation.referencesRocha-Meneses L., Et al., An overview of the socio-economic, technological, and environmental opportunities and challenges for renewable energy generation from residual biomass: a case study of biogas production in Colombia, Energies (Basel), 16, 16, (2023)
dc.relation.referencesVillarroel-Schneider J., Mainali B., Marti-Herrero J., Malmquist A., Martin A., Alejo L., Biogas based polygeneration plant options utilizing dairy farms waste: a Bolivian case, Sustain Energy Technol Assess, 37, (2020)
dc.relation.referencesMeyer E.L., Et al., Financial and economic feasibility of bio-digesters for rural residential demand-side management and sustainable development, Energy Rep, 7, pp. 1728-1741, (2021)
dc.relation.referencesOveren O.K., Obileke K.C., Meyer E.L., Makaka G., Apeh O.O., A hybrid solar–biogas system for post-COVID-19 rural energy access, Clean Energy, 8, 1, pp. 84-99, (2024)
dc.relation.referencesMeyer E.L., Overen O.K., Towards a sustainable rural electrification scheme in South Africa: analysis of the Status quo, Energy Rep, 7, pp. 4273-4287, (2021)
dc.relation.referencesKabir H., Yegbemey R.N., Bauer S., Factors determinant of biogas adoption in Bangladesh, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 28, pp. 881-889, (2013)
dc.relation.referencesMittal S., Ahlgren E.O., Shukla P.R., Barriers to biogas dissemination in India: a review, Energy Policy, 112, pp. 361-370, (2018)
dc.relation.referencesSturmer B., Leiers D., Anspach V., Brugging E., Scharfy D., Wissel T., Agricultural biogas production: a regional comparison of technical parameters, Renew Energy, 164, pp. 171-182, (2021)
dc.relation.referencesNaik L., Gebreegziabher Z., Tumwesige V., Balana B.B., Mwirigi J., Austin G., Factors determining the stability and productivity of small scale anaerobic digesters, Biomass Bioenergy, 70, pp. 51-57, (2014)
dc.relation.referencesPizarro-Loaiza C.A., Anton A., Torrellas M., Torres-Lozada P., Palatsi J., Bonmati A., Environmental, social and health benefits of alternative renewable energy sources. Case study for household biogas digesters in rural areas, J Clean Prod, 297, (2021)
dc.relation.referencesKulkarni I., Et al., Closed-loop biodigesters on small-scale farms in low- and middle-income countries: a review, Water, 13, 19, (2021)
dc.relation.referencesBarzallo-Bravo L.A., Carrera-Villacres D., Vargas-Verdesoto R.E., Ponce-Loaiza L.K., Correoso M., Gavilanes-Quishpi A.P., Bio-digestion and post-treatment of effluents by bio-fermentation, an opportunity for energy uses and generation of organic fertilizers from bovine manure, Int J Recycling Organ Waste Agric, 8, 4, pp. 431-438, (2019)
dc.relation.referencesOkwu M.O., Samuel O.D., Otanocha O.B., Balogun P.P., Tega O.J., Ojo E., Design and development of a bio-digester for production of biogas from dual waste, World J Eng, 17, 2, pp. 247-260, (2020)
dc.relation.referencesGausi E., Mlatho J.S.P., Mikeka C., A low-cost tubular biogas digester for rural households in Malawi, Malawi J Sci Technol, 12, 1, pp. 18-42, (2020)
dc.relation.referencesHenao A., Guzman L., Exploration of alternatives to reduce the gap in access to electricity in rural communities—las nubes village case (Barranquilla, Colombia), Energies, 17, 1, (2024)
dc.relation.referencesHelmcke C.
dc.relation.references(2023)
dc.relation.references(2024)
dc.relation.referencesLuna-Del Risco M., Et al., Biogas production from the specialized dairy farming and porcine subsectors in Antioquia, Colombia: theoretical and technical-energy potential approach, Agron Res, 20, 2, pp. 281-301, (2022)
dc.relation.referencesde Jesus R.H.G., de Souza J.T., Puglieri F.N., Piekarski C.M., de Francisco A.C., Biodigester location problems, its economic–environmental–social aspects and techniques: areas yet to be explored, Energy Rep, 7, pp. 3998-4008, (2021)
dc.relation.referencesMoustakas K., Sotiropoulos D., Vakalis S., Evaluation of the biogas potential of agricultural biomass waste for energy applications in Greece: a case study of the western Greece region, Waste Manage Res, 39, 3, pp. 438-447, (2021)
dc.relation.referencesGelani H.E., Dastgeer F., Idrees Z., Amjad K., Javed N., Barriers in the progress of domestic biogas plants in rural Pakistan, Int J Sustain Energ, 41, 6, pp. 713-729, (2022)
dc.relation.referencesRincon-Velasquez N.Y., Castiblanco-Rozo C., Políticas y normas sobre energías renovables para el desarrollo de biogás en Colombia. Una revisión, Gestión y Ambiente, 24, 1, (2021)
dc.relation.referencesBerhe M., Hoag D., Tesfay G., Keske C., Factors influencing the adoption of biogas digesters in rural Ethiopia, Energy Sustain Soc, 7, 1, (2017)
dc.relation.referencesDuque-Acevedo M., Ulloa-Murillo L.M., Belmonte-Urena L.J., Camacho-Ferre F., Mercl F., Tlustos P., Sustainable and circular agro-environmental practices: a review of the management of agricultural waste biomass in Spain and the Czech Republic, Waste Manage Res, 41, 5, pp. 955-969, (2023)
dc.relation.referencesRahman K.M., Melville L., Fulford D., Huq S.I., Green-house gas mitigation capacity of a small scale rural biogas plant calculations for Bangladesh through a general life cycle assessment, Waste Manage Res, 35, 10, pp. 1023-1033, (2017)
dc.relation.referencesBoyd Williams N., Quilliam R.S., Campbell B., Ghatani R., Dickie J., Taboos, toilets and biogas: socio-technical pathways to acceptance of a sustainable household technology, Energy Res Soc Sci, 86, (2022)
dc.relation.referencesLuo B., Khan A.A., Ali M.A.S., Yu J., An evaluation of influencing factors and public attitudes for the adoption of biogas system in rural communities to overcome energy crisis: a case study of Pakistan, Sci Total Environ, 778, (2021)
dc.relation.referencesYaqub A., Et al., Anaerobic digestion (AD) of organic waste is a sustainable waste, Manage Facility, pp. 626-650, (2020)
dc.relation.referencesAcharya R.N., Perez-Pena R., Role of comparative advantage in biofuel policy adoption in Latin America, Sustainability, 12, 4, (2020)
dc.relation.referencesAli S., Yan Q., Razzaq A., Khan I., Irfan M., Modeling factors of biogas technology adoption: a roadmap towards environmental sustainability and green revolution, EnvironSci Pollut Res, pp. 1-23, (2022)
dc.relation.referencesMarie M., Yirga F., Alemu G., Azadi H., Status of energy utilization and factors affecting rural households’ adoption of biogas technology in north-western Ethiopia, Heliyon, 7, 3, (2021)
dc.relation.referencesMendieta O., Castro L., Escalante H., Garfi M., Low-cost anaerobic digester to promote the circular bioeconomy in the non-centrifugal cane sugar sector: a life cycle assessment, Bioresour Technol, 326, January, (2021)
dc.relation.referencesPuzzolo E., Pope D., Stanistreet D., Rehfuess E.A., Bruce N.G., Clean fuels for resource-poor settings: a systematic review of barriers and enablers to adoption and sustained use’, (2016)
dc.relation.referencesSarker S.A., Wang S., Adnan K.M.M., Sattar M.N., Economic feasibility and determinants of biogas technology adoption: evidence from Bangladesh, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 123, (2020)
dc.relation.referencesUhunamure S.E., Nethengwe N.S., Tinarwo D., Correlating the factors influencing household decisions on adoption and utilisation of biogas technology in South Africa, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 107, pp. 264-273, (2019)
dc.relation.referencesUeda Yamaguchi N., Et al., A review of Moringa oleifera seeds in water treatment: trends and future challenges, Process Saf Environ Prot, 147, pp. 405-420, (2021)
dc.relation.referencesJung D.-K., Park S.-M., Economic value estimation of biogas utilization in public wastewater treatment plants of the Republic of Korea, Energies (Basel), 16, 5, (2023)
dc.relation.referencesAguilar F.X., Botero R., pp. 15-25, (2022)
dc.relation.referencesHernandez-Sarabia M., Sierra-Silva J., Delgadillo-Mirquez L., Avila-Navarro J., Carranza L., The potential of the biodigester as a useful tool in coffee farms, Appl Sci, 11, 15, (2021)
dc.relation.referencesKlimek K., Et al., Investment model of agricultural biogas plants for individual farms in Poland, Energies (Basel), 14, 21, (2021)
dc.relation.referencesAhmad M., Jabeen G., Biogas technology adoption and household welfare perspectives for sustainable development, Energy Policy, 181, (2023)
dc.relation.referencesJan I., Socio-economic characteristics influencing farmers’ willingness-to-adopt domestic biogas technology in rural Pakistan, EnvironSci Pollut Res, 28, 16, pp. 20690-20699, (2021)
dc.relation.referencesJan I., Akram W., Willingness of rural communities to adopt biogas systems in Pakistan: critical factors and policy implications, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 81, pp. 3178-3185, (2018)
dc.relation.referencesRozakis S., Et al., Policy impact on regional biogas using a modular modeling tool, Energies (Basel), 14, 13, (2021)
dc.relation.referencesTavera-Ruiz C., Et al., Current understanding and perspectives on anaerobic digestion in developing countries: Colombia case study, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 173, (2023)
dc.relation.referencesCalderon-Marquez A.J., Biogas utilization from municipal solid waste in developing countries towards the transition to sustainable development – the Colombian case, Dyna (Medellin), 90, 227, pp. 147-156, (2023)
dc.relation.referencesRodrigo-Ilarri J., Vargas-Terranova C.-A., Rodrigo-Clavero M.-E., Bustos-Castro P.-A., Advances on the implementation of circular economy techniques in rural areas in Colombia under a sustainable development framework, Sustainability, 13, 7, (2021)
dc.relation.referencesCruz-Santos M.M., Et al., Governmental policies to promote biogas production, boosting role of biogas in economic growth of developing nations, Biogas Production, pp. 447-469, (2020)
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.sourceSustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments
dc.sourceSustainable Energy Technol. Assess.
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBiogas
dc.subjectInfluencing factors
dc.subjectRenewable energy
dc.subjectSocio-economic
dc.subjectSustainability
dc.subjectColombia
dc.subjectBiotic
dc.subjectClean energy
dc.subjectDecentralized finance
dc.subjectBiodigesters
dc.subjectBiogas technologies
dc.subjectColombia
dc.subjectDomestic energy
dc.subjectInfluencing factor
dc.subjectRenewable energies
dc.subjectRural households
dc.subjectSocial factor
dc.subjectSocio-economic factor
dc.subjectSocio-economics
dc.subjectAlternative energy
dc.subjectInvestment
dc.subjectRenewable resource
dc.subjectRural area
dc.subjectSustainability
dc.subjectSustainable development
dc.subjectEnergy economics
dc.subjectBiogas
dc.subjectInfluencing factors
dc.subjectRenewable energy
dc.subjectSocio-economic
dc.subjectSustainability
dc.titleEvaluating the socio-economic drivers of household adoption of biodigester systems for domestic energy in rural Colombia
dc.typeArticle
dc.type.localArtículo revisado por paresspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Archivos

Colecciones