FREE SPEECH, ONLINE PLATFORMS AND COUNTER-TERRORISM: AN INTERNATIONAL APPROACH; [LIBERDADE DE EXPRESSÃO, PLATAFORMAS ONLINE E CONTRATERRORISMO: UMA ABORDAGEM INTERNACIONAL]

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.affiliationConci L.G.A., Faculdade de Direito, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, Brazil
dc.contributor.affiliationMendieta D., Universidad de Medellín, Colombia, Facultad de Derecho, Universidad de Medellín, Colombia
dc.contributor.affiliationLaurentiis L.C.D., PUC-Campinas, Brazil
dc.contributor.authorConci L.G.A.; Mendieta D.; Laurentiis L.C.D.
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-28T22:09:40Z
dc.date.available2025-04-28T22:09:40Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.descriptionObjective: This study aims to analyze how international legislation focused on combating terrorism impacts freedom of expression and the sharing of ideas in the digital environment, considering the use of surveillance technologies by governments and platforms. Methodology: Based on the actual literature on the subject, the research critically analyzes international legislation about platform regulations and surveillance technologies. It also examines the role of digital platforms in enforcing terms of service that are stricter than local laws, particularly regarding content deemed terrorist. Results: The results indicate that the ambiguous definition of "terrorist act" allows governments to classify criticisms as terrorism, restricting freedom of expression. Furthermore, the work shows how, by implementing stricter usage policies, digital platforms create an environment where expression is more monitored and, in many cases, censored. This exacerbates the adverse effects of constant surveillance on individual rights. Contributions: The study contributes to the debate on the need for balanced regulation to prevent terrorism without compromising freedom of expression. It highlights the importance of protecting fundamental rights in a context of increasing surveillance, proposing guidelines to avoid state and private abuses in the use of these technologies. © 2024, Centro Universitario Curitiba - UNICURITIBA. All rights reserved.
dc.identifier.doi10.26668/revistajur.2316-753X.v4i82.7507
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad de Medellínspa
dc.identifier.issn2316753X
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellínspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.udem.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11407/8841
dc.language.isopor
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Derechospa
dc.publisher.programDerechospa
dc.relation.citationendpage274
dc.relation.citationissue80
dc.relation.citationstartpage261
dc.relation.citationvolume4
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85213423833&doi=10.26668%2frevistajur.2316-753X.v4i82.7507&partnerID=40&md5=e1f0a739fbad663ef36e5826cd7ec994
dc.relation.referencesBARCZAK T., Der nervöse Staat: Ausnahmezustand und Resilienz des Rechts in der Sicherheitsgesellschaft, (2021)
dc.relation.referencesBENEDEK W., KETTEMANN M., Freedom of expression and the Internet, (2014)
dc.relation.referencesCOCHE E., Privatised enforcement and the right to freedom of expression in a world confronted with terrorism propaganda online, Internet Policy Review, 7, 4, (2018)
dc.relation.referencesEICHHORST K., Terrorismus – Eine Schwierige Begriffsbestimmung, Jahrbuch Terrorismus, 1, pp. 23-36, (2006)
dc.relation.referencesFISCHER M., The Chaos Machine: The Inside Story of How Social Media Rewired Our Minds and Our World
dc.relation.referencesGASCON J.A., The Inferential Meaning of Controversial Terms: The Case of “Terrorism, Topoi, 42, pp. 547-559, (2023)
dc.relation.referencesKLONICK K, The New Governors: The People, Rules, and Processes Governing Online Speech, Harvard Law Review, 131, pp. 1598-1670, (2017)
dc.relation.referencesJESTAEDT M., The German Reticence Vis-à-Vis the State of Emergency. The Rule of Crisis: Terrorism, Emergency Legislation and the Rule of Law, (2018)
dc.relation.referencesMOORE M., Democracy Hacked: How technology is destabilizing global politics, (2018)
dc.relation.referencesSAUL B., Defining terrorism in international law, (2006)
dc.relation.referencesSCHULZ W., Regulating Intermediaries to Protect Privacy Online – the Case of the German NetzDG, Probleme und Potenziale des NetzDG, 48, pp. 7-19, (2019)
dc.relation.referencesSCHMID A. P., The definition of terrorism, The Routledge Handbook of Terrorism Research, pp. 39-98, (2011)
dc.relation.referencesSAMOUR N., Politisches Freund-Feind-Denken im Zeitalter des Terrorismus, Der Terrorist als Feind? Personalisierung im Polizei-und Völkerrecht, pp. 49-66, (2020)
dc.relation.referencesSCHMID A. P., The definition of terrorism, The Routledge Handbook of Terrorism Research, pp. 39-98, (2011)
dc.relation.referencesSTONE G., Free Speech in the Twenty-First Century: Ten Lessons from the Twentieth Century Lead Article, Pepperdine Law Review, 26, pp. 273-300, (2009)
dc.relation.referencesWILLIAMSON M., Terrorism, war, and international law: The legality of the use of force against Afghanistan in 2001, (2009)
dc.relation.referencesVASHAKMADZE M., Der Terrorismus und das Völkerrecht: Aktuelle Herausforderungen, Terrorismusforschung in Deutschland, (2011)
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.sourceRevista Juridica
dc.sourceRev. Jurid.
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectFreedom of expression
dc.subjectHuman rights
dc.subjectState surveillance
dc.subjectTerrorism
dc.subjectFreedom of expression
dc.subjectHuman rights
dc.subjectState surveillance
dc.subjectTerrorism
dc.titleFREE SPEECH, ONLINE PLATFORMS AND COUNTER-TERRORISM: AN INTERNATIONAL APPROACH; [LIBERDADE DE EXPRESSÃO, PLATAFORMAS ONLINE E CONTRATERRORISMO: UMA ABORDAGEM INTERNACIONAL]
dc.typeArticle
dc.type.localArtículo revisado por paresspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Archivos

Colecciones

Indexados Scopus