Neoliberalismo y crisis de la salud pública: privatización, desigualdad y búsqueda de eficiencia

dc.audienceComunidad Universidad de Medellínspa
dc.contributor.authorSampaio, José Adércio Leite
dc.contributor.authorFurbino Marques, Meire Aparecida
dc.coverage.spatialLat: 06 15 00 N degrees minutes Lat: 6.2500 decimal degreesLong: 075 36 00 W degrees minutes Long: -75.6000 decimal degrees
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-29T13:40:33Z
dc.date.available2025-08-29T13:40:33Z
dc.date.issued2025-06-27
dc.descriptionThis article examines neoliberalism’s impact on global healthcare governance, highlighting how privatization, fragmentation, and deregulation of services con- tributed to the weakening of public systems and the worsening of access inequa- lities, especially during pandemics. The central objective is to analyze health care systems, identifying their weaknesses and potential. The analysis includes the systems in Brazil (SUS) and the United Kingdom (NHS), whose characteristics are contrasted with the model South Korea adopted. The article applies a deductive method and a scientific research methodology based on a specialized biblio- graphic review—including books, journals, reports, and academic articles—that allows for a critical analysis of the impact of neoliberalism and the search for alternatives that reposition the State as a protagonist in guaranteeing the right to healthcare. This article demonstrates the influence of neoliberalism on the healthcare systems in Brazil and the United Kingdom, as well as the new model South Korea adopted. Finally, it is concluded that, considering healthcare as a universal right and a fundamental public asset, it is essential to reevaluate care models, prioritizing universality, equity, and the capacity to respond to healthcare crises, to the detriment of a market-centered logic.eng
dc.descriptionEste artículo examina el impacto del neoliberalismo en la gobernanza global de la salud, evidenciando cómo la privatización, fragmentación y desregulación de los servicios contribuyeron al debilitamiento de los sistemas públicos y al agrava- miento de las desigualdades en el acceso, especialmente durante las pandemias. El objetivo central es analizar los sistemas de atención a la salud, identificando sus fragilidades y potencialidades. Se analizan los sistemas de Brasil (SUS) y del Reino Unido (NHS), cuyas características se contrastan con el modelo adoptado en Corea del Sur. Se aplica el método deductivo y una metodología de investigación científica basada en revisión bibliográfica especializada —incluyendo libros, revistas, informes y artículos académicos— que permiten un análisis crítico del impacto del neoliberalismo y de la búsqueda de alternativas que reposicionen al Estado como protagonista en la garantía del derecho a la salud. Se demuestra la in- fluencia del neoliberalismo en los sistemas de salud de Brasil y del Reino Unido, así como el nuevo modelo adoptado en Corea del Sur. Finalmente, se concluye que, considerando la salud como un derecho universal y un bien público fundamental, es imperativo reevaluar los modelos de atención, priorizando la universalidad, la equidad y la capacidad de respuesta ante crisis sanitarias, en detrimento de una lógica centrada en el mercado.spa
dc.description.abstractEste artigo examina o impacto do neoliberalismo na governança global de saúde, evidenciando como a privatização, fragmentação e desregulamentação dos serviços contribuíram para a fragilização dos sistemas públicos e o agravamento das desigualdades no acesso, especialmente, durante pandemias. O objetivo central é analisar os sistemas de atendimento à saúde, identificando suas fragilidades e potencialidades. São analisados os sistemas do Brasil (SUS) e do Reino Unido (NHS), cujas características são contrastadas com o modelo adotado na Coreia do Sul. Aplica-se o método dedutivo e uma metodologia de investigação científica, baseada em revisão bibliográfica realizada de literatura especializada —incluindo livros, periódicos, relatórios e artigos acadêmicos— que permitem uma análise crítica do impacto do neoliberalismo e da busca por alternativas que reposicionem o Estado como protagonista na garantia do direito à saúde. Demonstra-se a influência do neoliberalismo nos sistemas de saúde do Brasil e do Reino Unido, bem como o novo modelo adotado na Coreia do Sul. Ao final, conclui-se que, considerando a saúde um direito universal e um bem público fundamental, é imperativo reavaliar os modelos de assistência, priorizando a universalidade, a equidade e a capacidade de resposta a crises sanitárias, em detrimento de uma lógica centrada no mercado.por
dc.format.extentp. 1-31spa
dc.format.mediumElectrónicospa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypePDF
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.22395/ojum.v24n51a5032
dc.identifier.eissn2248-4078
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad de Medellínspa
dc.identifier.issn1692-2530
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellínspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.udem.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11407/9041
dc.language.isopor
dc.publisherUniversidad de Medellínspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Derechospa
dc.publisher.placeMedellínspa
dc.relation.citationendpage31
dc.relation.citationissue51
dc.relation.citationstartpage1
dc.relation.citationvolume24
dc.relation.haspartOpinión Jurídica; Vol. 24 Núm. 51 enero-junio 2025spa
dc.relation.ispartofseriesOpinión Jurídica; Vol. 24 No. 51 (2025)spa
dc.relation.referencesAlbino, N. M. & Liporoni, A. A. R. (2020). O desmonte da política de saúde sob a gestão das organizações sociais. Revista Família, Ciclos de Vida e Saúde no Contexto Social, 8(3), 1099-1106. https:// doi.org/10.18554/refacs.v8i0.5029
dc.relation.referencesAndreazzi, M. F. S. & Bravo, M. I. S. (2014). Privatização da gestão e organizações sociais na atenção à saúde. Trabalho, educação e saúde, 12(3), p. 499-518. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-7746-sip00019
dc.relation.referencesAntunes, R. (2020). Coronavírus: o trabalho sob o fogo cruzado. Boitempo.
dc.relation.referencesBahia, L. (2010). A privatização no sistema de saúde brasileiro nos anos 2000: tendências e justificação. In N. R. Santos & D. C. Amarante (orgs.), Gestão pública e relação público privado na saúde (pp. 115- 128). Cebes.
dc.relation.referencesBenites, A. & Gortázar, N. G. M. (2020, 3 de abril). Mandetta, o conservador que vestiu o colete do SUS e entrincheirou Bolsonaro. El País. https://brasil.elpais.com/brasil/2020-04-04/mandetta-o-conservador- que-vestiu-o-colete-do-sus-e-entrincheirou-bolsonaro.html
dc.relation.referencesBiernath, A. (2020, 11 de novembro). Anvisa, Butantan e Bolsonaro erraram na suspensão dos testes da CoronaVac, diz epidemiologista. BBC News Brasil. https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/brasil-54898488
dc.relation.referencesBorges, F. T., Moimas, S. A. S., Siqueira, C. E. & Garbin, C. A. S. (2012). Anatomia da privatização neoliberal do Sistema Único de Saúde. Cultura Acadêmica.
dc.relation.referencesBousquat, A., Ackerman, M., Mendes, A., Louvison, M., Frazão, P. & Narvai, P. C. (2021). Pandemia de covid-19: o SUS mais necessário do que nunca. Revista USP, 1(128), 13-26. https://doi.org/10.11606/ issn.2316-9036.i128p13-26
dc.relation.referencesBraithwaite, J. (2005). Markets in Vice, Markets in Virtue. Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesBraithwaite, J. (2008). Regulatory Capitalism: How it works, ideas for making it work better. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
dc.relation.referencesBrasil. (2021). Controladoria-Geral da República. Portal da Transparência. Orçamento do Ministério da Saúde, 2021. https://www.portaltransparencia.gov.br/funcoes/10-saude?ano=2021
dc.relation.referencesBresser-Pereira, L. C. (1996). Da administração burocrática à gerencial. Revista do Serviço Público (RSP), 47(1), 7-40. https://doi.org/10.21874/rsp.v47i1.702
dc.relation.referencesCampos, G. W. S. (2006). Efeitos paradoxais da descentralização do Sistema Único de Saúde do Brasil. In S. Fleury (org.), Democracia, descentralização e desenvolvimento: Brasil & Espanha (pp. 417-442). Editora FGV.
dc.relation.referencesCampos, G. W. S. (2020). O pesadelo macabro da Covid-19 no Brasil: entre negacionismos e desvarios. Trabalho, Educação e Saúde, 18(3), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-7746-sol00279
dc.relation.referencesCaponi, S., Brzozowski, F. S., Hellmann, F. & Bittencourt, S. C. (2021). O uso político da cloroquina: COVID-19, negacionismo e neoliberalismo. Revista Brasileira de Sociologia-RBS, 9(21), 78-102. https:// doi.org/10.20336/rbs.774
dc.relation.referencesCarneiro, R. C. A. (2014). A complementaridade invertida no SUS: privatização progressiva da atenção aos renais crônicos em diálise Alagoas e no Brasil [dissertação de mestrado, Universidade Federal de Alagoas]. Repositório Institucional da Ufal. http://www.repositorio.ufal.br/handle/riufal/2273
dc.relation.referencesCerny, P. G. (1997). Paradoxes of the competition state: The dynamics of political globalization. Government and Opposition, 32(2), 251-274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.1997.tb00161.x
dc.relation.referencesCezar, L. S. & Maciel, J. N. (2021). Infodemia no contexto da pandemia de COVID-19 no Brasil: uma política de contaminação?. Liinc em Revista, 17(1), 1-22. https://revista.ibict.br/liinc/article/view/5703
dc.relation.referencesChakelian, A. (2020, 16 de outubro). Revealed: The £208m food box rip-off. The New Statesman. https:// www.newstatesman.com/world/uk/2020/10/208m-food-box-rip-off-private-outsource-government- contract-covid-corona-virus
dc.relation.referencesCharlesworh, A. & Johnson, P. (2018). Securing the future: Funding health and social care to the2030s. Institute for Fiscal Studies; The Health Foundation; NHS Confederation. https://ifs.org.uk/publications/ securing-future-funding-health-and-social-care-2030s
dc.relation.referencesCole, J. & Dodds, K. (2021). Unhealthy geopolitics? Bordering disease in the time of coronavirus. Geographical Research, 59(2),169-181. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12457
dc.relation.referencesCorreia, M. V. C., Santos, V. M. S. & Alves, P. K. L. (2021). A mercantialização da saúde no enfrentamento da COVID-19: O fortalecimento do setor privado. Humanidades & Inovação, 8(35), 71-85. https:// revista.unitins.br/index.php/humanidadeseinovacao/article/view/5358
dc.relation.referencesDayan, M., Ward, D., Gardner, T. & Kelly, E. (2018). How good is the NHS?. The Health Foundation; Institute for Fiscal Studies; The King’s Fund; Nuffield Trust. https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/sites/ default/files/2018-06/NHS_at_70_how_good_is_the_NHS.pdf
dc.relation.referencesDH Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Team. (2011, 10 de novembro). UK influenza pandemic preparedness strategy 2011. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/ attachment_data/file/213717/dh_131040.pdf
dc.relation.referencesEwing, K. D. (2020). Covid-19: Government by decree. King’s Law Journal, 31(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2020.1759398
dc.relation.referencesFarmer, P. (2004). An Anthropology of Structural Violence. Current Anthropology, 45(3), 305-325. https:// doi.org/10.1086/382250
dc.relation.referencesFidler, D. P. (2005). From International Sanitary Conventions to Global Health Security: The New International Health Regulations. Chinese Journal of International Law, 4(2), 325-392. https://doi. org/10.1093/chinesejil/jmi029
dc.relation.referencesFleury, S., Ouverney, A. L. M, Kronemberger, T. S. & Zani, F. B. (2010). Governança local no sistema descentralizado de saúde no Brasil. Revista Panameña de Salud Publica, 28(6), 446-55. https://doi. org/10.1590/S1020-49892010001200006
dc.relation.referencesFrederickson, H. G., Ferguson, K. & Kim, S. (2012). The changing role of the state: Privatization, hollowing out, and hybridity. In J. M. Shafritz, E. W. Russell & C. P. Borick (eds.), Introducing public administration. 8th ed. (pp. 231-249). Longman.
dc.relation.referencesFrederickson, H. G. (2013). Can Public Administration Theory Help Answer Woodrow Wilson’s Persistent Question for Public Administration? Public Administration Review, 73(1), 92-101.
dc.relation.referencesFurlam, T. O., Abreu, L. H. D., Machado, C. J. & Pereira, C. C. A. (2021). A saúde da população e o enfretamento da pandemia de Covid-19 no Brasil: o esforço dos gestores e profissionais da saúde. Revista Brasileira de Estudos da População, 38, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.20947/S0102-3098a0158
dc.relation.referencesGiddens, A. (2003). Mundo em descontrole: o que a globalização está fazendo de nós. 8ª ed. Record.
dc.relation.referencesGilpin, R. (2001). Global political economy: understanding the international economic order. Princeton University Press.
dc.relation.referencesGraham, J. D., Noe, P. R. & Branch, E. L. (2006). Managing the Regulatory State: The Experience of the Bush Administration. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 33(4), 101-148. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ ulj/vol33/iss4/1/
dc.relation.referencesGrey, S., MacAskill, A. (2021, 7 de abril). Special report: Johnson listened to his scientists about coronavirus –but they were slow to sound the alarm. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus- britain-path-speci-idUSKBN21P1VF
dc.relation.referencesGuttmann, R. (2016). Finance-led capitalism: shadow banking, re-regulation, and the future of global markets. Palgrave Macmillan.
dc.relation.referencesHall, D., Lister, J., Hobbs, C., Robinson, P. & Jarvis, C. (2020). Privatised and unprepared: The NHS supply chain. University of Greenwich; We Own It. https://web.archive.org/web/20231006133923/https:// weownit.org.uk/sites/default/files/attachments/Privatised%20and%20Unprepared%20-%20The%20 NHS%20Supply%20Chain%20Final.pdf
dc.relation.referencesHarvey, D. (2020). Política anticapitalista em tempos de COVID-19. In D. Harvey, M. Davis, A. Bihr, R. Zibechi, A. Badiou & S. Žižek (eds.), Coronavírus e a luta de classes (pp. 13-24). Terra sem Amos.
dc.relation.referencesHirst, P. (2000). Democracy and Governance. In J. Pierre (ed.), Debating Governance: Authority, Steering, and Democracy (pp. 13-35). Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesHolzinger, K. & Schmidt, S. K. (2015). From the Positive to the Regulatory State: A Transformation in the Machinery of Governance? In S. Leibfried, E. Huber, M. Lange, J. D. Levy, & J. D. Stephens (eds). The Oxford handbook of transformations of the state (pp. 499-515). Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesHomedes, N. & Ugalde, A. (2005). Why neoliberal health reforms have failed in Latin America. Health policy, 71(1), 83-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2004.01.011
dc.relation.referencesInternational Monetary Fund (IMF). World Bank (WB). (2002, 26 de março). Review of the poverty reduction strategy paper (PRSP) approach: early experience with interim PRSPs and full PRSPs. IMF/World Bank. https://www.imf.org/External/NP/prspgen/review/2002/032602a.htm
dc.relation.referencesJones, C. & Hameiri, P. (2020). The UK’s “improvisational authoritarianism” and the COVID-19 pandemic: A call for democratic renewal. Political Quarterly, 91(2), 365-374.
dc.relation.referencesKentikelenis, A., King, L., McKee, M. & Stuckler, D. (2015). The international monetary fund and the Ebola outbreak. The Lancet Global Health, 3(2), E69-E70. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/langlo/ article/PIIS2214-109X(14)70377-8/fulltext
dc.relation.referencesKettl, D. F. (1988). Government by Proxy: (mis?) Managing Federal Programs. CQ Press.
dc.relation.referencesKeynes, J. M. (1926). The end of laissez-faire. Hogarth Press.
dc.relation.referencesKiely, R. (2018). The neoliberal paradox. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
dc.relation.referencesKim, J. Y. (2000). Dying for Growth: Global Inequality and the Health of the Poor. Common Courage Press.
dc.relation.referencesKim, J. Y., Shakow, A., Kedar, M. Vanderwarker, C., Gupta, R. & Farmer, P. (2005). Limited good and limited vision: multidrug-resistant tuberculosis and global health policy. Social Science & Medicine, 61(4), 847-859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.046
dc.relation.referencesKissler, L. & Heidemann, F. (2006). The Will to Regulate: How Governments Choose. Journal of Public Policy, 26(4), 479-505.
dc.relation.referencesLa Forgia, G. M. & Couttolenc, B. F. (2008). Hospital performance in Brazil : the search for excellence. World Bank.
dc.relation.referencesLaboté, R. & Gagnon, M. (2010). Framing Health and Foreign Policy:Lessons for Global Health Diplomacy. Globalization and Health, 6(14), p. 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-8603-6-14
dc.relation.referencesLevi-Faur, D. (2005). The global diffusion of regulatory capitalism. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598(1), 12-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716204272371
dc.relation.referencesLim, S. H., Sziarto, K. (2020). When the illiberal and the neoliberal meet around infectious diseases: An Examination of the MERS response in South Korea. Territory, Politics, Governance, 8(1), 60-76. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2019.1700825
dc.relation.referencesMajone, G. (1997). From the Positive to the Regulatory State: Causes and Consequences of Changes in the Mode of Governance. Journal of Public Policy, 17(2), 139-167. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0143814X00003524
dc.relation.referencesMajone, G. (2013). Regulation and Democracy. In M. Moran, M. Rein & R. E. Goodin (eds.), The Oxford handbook of public policy (pp. 809-834). Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesMarphatia, A. A. (2009). The adverse effects of International Monetary Fund programs on the health and education workforce. International Journal of Health Services, 40(1), 165-178. https://doi. org/10.2190/HS.40.1.j
dc.relation.referencesMcgreevey, W. P. (1982). Brazilian health care financing and health policy: an international perspective (English). Population, Health and Nutrition Department technical notes | no. GEN 6. The World Bank. http:// documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/614871468914787183
dc.relation.referencesMilward, H. B. & Provan, K. G. (2000a). Governing the Hollow State. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2), 359-379. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024273
dc.relation.referencesMilward, H. B. & Provan, K. G. (2000b). Public Management: The state of the craft. Georgetown University Press.
dc.relation.referencesMirowski, P. & Plehwe, D. (2009). The road from Mont Pèlerin: the making of the neoliberal thought collective. Harvard University Press. Modelski, G. (2003). Globalization as evolutionary process: modeling global change in the long run. Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesMoe, T. M. (1995). The Politics of Structural Choice: Toward a Theory of Public Bureaucracy. In O. E. Williamson (ed.), Organization Theory. From Chester Barnard to the Present and Beyond (pp. 116-153). Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesMonteiro, M. G. (2018). As mudanças de direção nas políticas públicas: atores e estratégias ocultas na implementação do Sistema Único de Saúde. In: S. Fleury (ed.), Teoria da reforma sanitária: diálogos críticos (pp. 247-289). Fiocruz.
dc.relation.referencesMudge, S. L. (2016). The scholar and the ‘Washington Consensus’: John Williamson’s political economy of policy reform. Review of International Political Economy, 23(6), 996-1022.
dc.relation.referencesMutchnick, I. S., Stern, D. T. & Moyer, C. A. (2005). Trading Health Services. Across Borders: Gats, Markets, And Caveats: The health services sector of the developed world must become more aware of business opportunities in less developed countries. Health Affairs, 24(Sup 1), W5-42-p. W5-51. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.W5.42
dc.relation.referencesNeumann, I. B. (2001). The future of international relations: masters in the making? Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesNogueira, R. P. (2010). O desenvolvimento federativo do SUS e as novas modalidades institucionais de gerência das unidades assistenciais. In N. R. dos Santos & P. D. Amarante. (Orgs.), Gestão pública e relação público-privado na saúde (pp. 24-47). Cebes.
dc.relation.referencesNoy, S. (2011). New contexts, different patterns? A comparative analysis of social spending and government health expenditure in Latin America and the OECD. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 52(3), 215-244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715211408760
dc.relation.referencesOppenheim, B, Gallivan, M., Madhav, N. K., Brown, N., Serhiyenko, V., Wolfe, N. D. & Ayscue, P. (2019). Assessing global preparedness for the next pandemic: development and application of an Epidemic Preparedness Index. BMJ Global Health, 4(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001157
dc.relation.referencesOwoh, K. (1996). Fragmenting Health Care: The World Bank Prescription for Africa. Alternatives, 21(2), 211-235. https://doi.org/10.1177/030437549602100204
dc.relation.referencesPackard, R. M. (2016). A History of Global Health: Interventions into the Lives of Other Peoples. Johns Hopkins University Press. https://doi.org/10.56021/9781421420325
dc.relation.referencesPaim, J. S. & Teixeira, C. F. (2007). Configuração institucional e gestão do Sistema Único de Saúde: problemas e desafios. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva 12(Supl), 1.819-1.829. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413- 81232007000700005
dc.relation.referencesPaula, A. P. P. (2005). Por uma nova gestão pública. Editora FGV.
dc.relation.referencesPeele, G. & Kaye, R. (2008). Conflict of interest in British public life. In A. L. Gash & C. Trost, C. (eds), Conflict of interest and public life: Cross-national perspectives (pp. 155-187). Cambridge University Press.
dc.relation.referencesPereira, L. C. B. (1996). Gerencialismo Reformatório: a administração pública sob a ótica do reformador. MARE.
dc.relation.referencesPierre, J. (2000). Introduction: Understanding Governance. In J. Pierre (ed.), Debating Governance: Authority, Steering, and Democracy (pp. 1-12). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ oso/9780198295143.001.0001
dc.relation.referencesPollock, A. M. & Price, D. (2011). The final frontier: The UK’s new coalition government turns the English national health service over to the global health care market. Health Sociology Review, 20(3), 294–305. https://doi.org/10.5172/hesr.2011.20.3.294
dc.relation.referencesRaco, M. (2016). State-led privatisation and the demise of the democratic state: Welfare reform and localism in an era of regulatory capitalism. Routledge.
dc.relation.referencesReis, C. R. & Paim, J. S. (2021). A Reforma Sanitária Brasileira durante os governos Dilma: uma análise da conjuntura. Saúde em Debate, 45(130), 563-574. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-1104202113001
dc.relation.referencesReynolds, L. A., Lister, J., Scott-Samuel, A. & Mckee, M. (2011). Liberating the NHS: Source and destination of the Lansley reform. School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; Coventry University; University of Liverpool. https://web.archive.org/web/20180112042859/http://pcwww.liv.ac.uk/~alexss/nhs.pdf
dc.relation.referencesRhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The New Governance: Governing without Government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652-667. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x
dc.relation.referencesRittberger, V. (2001). Global governance and the United Nations system. United Nations University Press. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/472465?v=pdf
dc.relation.referencesRodrigues, A. B., Menezes, C. A. F., Sousa, E. B., Cariaga, M. H. & Burginski, V. M. (2021). A intensificação das privatizações da política de saúde no enfrentamento à pandemia da COVID-19 no Estado do Tocantins. Humanidades & Inovação, 8(35), 113-128. https://revista.unitins.br/index.php/ humanidadeseinovacao/article/view/5344
dc.relation.referencesRoyal College Of Physicians (RCP). (2016, 4 de outubro). Underfunded, underdoctored, overstretched - The NHS in 2016. https://www.rcp.ac.uk/news-and-media/news-and-opinion/underfunded-underdoctored- overstretched-the-nhs-in-2016/
dc.relation.referencesRushton, S. (2011). Global health security: Security for whom? Security from what?. Political Studies,59(4), 779-796. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00919.x
dc.relation.referencesSampaio, J. A. L. (2013). Teoria da Constituição e dos Direitos Fundamentais. Del Rey.
dc.relation.referencesSantos, I. S., Santos, M. A. B. & Borges, D. C. L. (2013). Mix público-privado no sistema de saúde brasileiro: realidade e futuro do SUS. In Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, P. Gadelha (coord.), J. C. Noronha, T. R. Pereira & A. B. Paiva (orgs.), A saúde no Brasil em 2030: Prospecção estratégica do sistema de saúde brasileiro. Vol. 4: Estrutura do financiamento e do gasto setorial (pp. 73-131). Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. https://homologacao-saudeamanha.icict.fiocruz.br/livros/volume-4-estrutura-do-financiamento- e-do-gasto-setorial/
dc.relation.referencesSantos, M. A. B. & Passos, S. R. L. (2010). Comércio internacional de serviços e complexo industrial da saúde: implicações para os sistemas nacionais de saúde. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 26(8), 1483- 1493. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2010000800003
dc.relation.referencesScheffer, M. (2015). O capital estrangeiro e a privatização do sistema de saúde brasileiro. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 31(4), 663-666. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311XPE010415
dc.relation.referencesSlobodian, Q. (2018). Globalists: the end of empire and the birth of neoliberalism. Harvard University Press.
dc.relation.referencesSodré, F. (2020). Epidemia de Covid-19: questões críticas para a gestão da saúde pública no Brasil.Trabalho, Educação e Saúde, 18(3), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-7746-sol00302
dc.relation.referencesSparke, M. (2020). Neoliberal regime change and the remaking of global health: From rollback disinvestment to rollout reinvestment and reterritorialization. Review of International Political Economy, 27(1), 48-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2019.1624382
dc.relation.referencesStiglitz, J. E. (2004). A globalização e seus malefícios: a promessa de um mundo sem fronteiras seduz os países em desenvolvimento, mas os resultados têm sido pobreza e instabilidade. Futura.
dc.relation.referencesStuckler, D. & Basu, S. (2013). The body economic: why austerity kills. Basic Books.
dc.relation.referencesSturgeon, D. (2014). The business of the NHS: The rise and rise of consumer culture and commodification in the provision of healthcare services. Critical social policy, 34(3), 405-416. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0261018314527717
dc.relation.referencesSupremo Tribunal Federal. (2015, 16 de abril). Ação Direta de Inconstitucionalidade 1923/DF (Min Ayres Britto, Rel.). https://www.jusbrasil.com.br/jurisprudencia/stf/1370468580/inteiro-teor-1370468593
dc.relation.referencesSupremo Tribunal Federal. (2020, 15 de abril). Referendo na Medida Cautelar na Ação Direta de Inconstitucionalidade 6341/ DF (Min. Marco Aurélio, Rel.). https://web. archive.org/web/20220201193729/https://redir.stf.jus.br/paginadorpub/paginador. jsp?docTP=TP&docID=754372183
dc.relation.referencesSupremo Tribunal Federal. Pleno. (2020, 6 de maio). Referendo na Medida Cautelar na Ação Direta de Inconstitucionalidade 6343/ DF (Min. Alexandre de Moraes, Rel.). https:// web.archive.org/web/20221208015021/https://redir.stf.jus.br/paginadorpub/paginador. jsp?DocTP=TP&docID=754391739
dc.relation.referencesSupremo Tribunal Federal. (2020, 15 de maio). Medida Cautelar na Ação Direta de Inconstitucionalidade 6421 /DF (Min. Roberto Barroso, Rel.). https://web.archive.org/web/20221216055632/https://redir. stf.jus.br/paginadorpub/paginador.jsp?docTP=TP&docID=754359227
dc.relation.referencesSupremo Tribunal Federal. (2020, 2 de setembro). Ação Direta de Inconstitucionalidade 6362/DF (Min. Ricardo Lewandowski, Rel.). https://web.archive.org/web/20220201193747/https://redir.stf.jus.br/ paginadorpub/paginador.jsp?docTP=TP&docID=754607621
dc.relation.referencesSupremo Tribunal Federal. (2020, 15 de setembro). Referendo na Medida Cautelar na Ação Cível Originária 3518/DF (Min. Ricardo Lewandowski, Rel.). https://web.archive.org/web/20220201193652/ https://redir.stf.jus.br/paginadorpub/paginador.jsp?docTP=TP&docID=758761592
dc.relation.referencesSupremo Tribunal Federal. Pleno. (2020, 13 de outubro). Referendo na Medida Cautelar na Arguição de Descumprimento de Preceito Fundamental 672/DF (Min. Alexandre de Moraes, Rel.). https://web.archive.org/web/20220701193102/https://redir.stf.jus.br/paginadorpub/paginador. jsp?docTP=TP&docID=754239592
dc.relation.referencesSupremo Tribunal Federal. (2020, 17 de dezembro). Ação Direta de Inconstitucionalidade 6586/DF (Min. Ricardo Lewandowski, Rel.). https://web.archive.org/web/20250206180914/https://portal. stf.jus.br/processos/detalhe.asp?incidente=6033038
dc.relation.referencesSupremo Tribunal Federal. (2021, 17 de fevereiro). Arguição de Descumprimento de Preceito Fundamental 714/DF (Min. Gilmar Mendes, Rel.). https://web.archive.org/web/20220704101541/ https://redir.stf.jus.br/paginadorpub/paginador.jsp?docTP=TP&docID=755138938
dc.relation.referencesSupremo Tribunal Federal. (2021, 8 de abril). Referendo na Medida Cautelar na Ação Cível Originária 3473/DF (Min. Rosa Weber, Rel.). https://web.archive.org/web/20240415001640/https://redir.stf. jus.br/paginadorpub/paginador.jsp?docTP=TP&docID=755935256
dc.relation.referencesSupremo Tribunal Federal. (2021, 8 de abril). Arguição de Descumprimento de Preceito Fundamental 811/SP (Min. Gilmar Mendes, Rel.). https://web.archive.org/web/20230628030030/https://redir.stf. jus.br/paginadorpub/paginador.jsp?docTP=TP&docID=756267154
dc.relation.referencesSupremo Tribunal Federal. (2020, 29 de abril). Referendo na Medida Cautelar na Ação Direta de Inconstitucionalidade 6342/DF (Min. Alexandre de Moraes, Rel.). https://www.jusbrasil.com.br/ jurisprudencia/stf/1121783889
dc.relation.referencesSupremo Tribunal Federal. (2021, 14 de junho). Referendo em Tutela Provisória na Ação Cível Originária 3490/DF (Min. Rosa Weber, Rel.). https://www.jusbrasil.com.br/jurisprudencia/stf/1236989466/ inteiro-teor-1236989468
dc.relation.referencesSupremo Tribunal Federal. (2021, 29 de junho). Embl.Decl. na Arguição de Descumprimento de Preceito Fundamental 742/DF (Min. Edson Facchin, Rel.). https://web.archive.org/web/20210702061646/ https://www.stf.jus.br/arquivo/cms/noticiaNoticiaStf/anexo/ADPF742ed.pdf
dc.relation.referencesSupremo Tribunal Federal. Pleno. (2021, 11 de novembro). Tutela Provisória na Ação Cível Originária 3475/DF (Min. Rosa Weber, Rel.). https://web.archive.org/web/20210302020748/https://www.stf. jus.br/arquivo/cms/noticiaNoticiaStf/anexo/aco3475.pdf
dc.relation.referencesTayob, R. K. (2008, 24 de janeiro). WHO Board Debates “Global Health Security”. Climate, IPRs’. SUNS #6399. Third World Network. https://web.archive.org/web/20080907222652/http://www.twnside. org.sg/title2/intellectual_property/info.service/2008/twn.ipr.info.080101.htm
dc.relation.referencesTeixeira, C. F. S. & Paim, J. S. (2018). A crise mundial de 2008 e o golpe do capital na política de saúde no Brasil. Saúde em Debate, 42(esp), 11-21. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-11042018s201
dc.relation.referencesUnited Kingdom (UK), House of Commons. (2014, 26 de fevereiro). Contracting out public services to the private sector. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmselect/cmpubacc/777/777.pdf
dc.relation.referencesVale, M. M., Berenguer, E., Menezes, M. A., Castro, E. B. V, Siqueira, L. P. & Portela, R. C. Q. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic as an opportunity to weaken environmental protection in Brazil. Biological conservation, 255, 108994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.108994
dc.relation.referencesVilar, M. E. M. & Torres, A. C. S. (2021). O capitalismo dependente, o subfinanciamento do SUS e as iniquidades no acesso às vacinas para o enfrentamento ao contexto pandêmico da COVID-19 no Brasil. Mosaico - Revista Multidisciplinar de Humanidades,12(3), 23-29. https://doi.org/10.21727/ rm.v12i3.2926
dc.relation.referencesVogel, S. K. (2018). Marketcraft: How governments make markets work. Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesWamala, S. K. & Ichiro Mpepo, B. P. M. (2007). Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers: bold new approach to poverty eradication or old wine in new bottles? In I. Kawachi & S. Wamala (eds), Globalization and Health (pp. 234-249). Oxford University Press.
dc.relation.referencesWorld Bank. (1992). Governance and development. The World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/ curated/en/604951468739447676/Governance-and-development
dc.relation.referencesWorld Bank. (2005). Economic Growth in the 1990s: Learning from a Decade of Reform. The World Bank, 2005. https://hdl.handle.net/10986/7370
dc.relation.referencesWorld Health Organization (WHO). (2008, 27 de agosto). Closing the Gap in a Generation: Health Equity through Action on the Social Determinants of Health. WHO. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/ WHO-IER-CSDH-08.1
dc.relation.referencesWorld Health Organization (WHO). (2009a [1948]). Constitution of the World Health Organization. In Basic Documents, forty-seventh edition (pp. 1-19). World Health Organization. http://apps.who.int/iris/ bitstream/handle/10665/44192/9789241650472_eng.pdf?sequence=1
dc.relation.referencesWorld Health Organization (WHO). (2019). A world at risk. Annual report on global prepared-ness for health emergencies. Global Preparedness Monitoring Board. https://www.gpmb.org/reports/annual- report-2019
dc.relation.referencesWorld Health Organization (WHO). (2020). Budget implementation summary WHO’s biennial Programme budget is based on the principles of transparency, accountability and providing value for money. https://www. who.int/about/accountability/results/who-results-report-2020-mtr
dc.relation.urihttps://revistas.udem.edu.co/index.php/opinion/article/view/5032
dc.rights.creativecommonsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0*
dc.sourceOpinión Jurídica; Vol. 24 No. 51 (2025): (enero-junio); 1-31
dc.subjectNeoliberalismeng
dc.subjectPublic health systemseng
dc.subjectRegulationeng
dc.subjectInequalityeng
dc.subjectPandemiceng
dc.subjectNeoliberalismospa
dc.subjectSistemas de salud públicaspa
dc.subjectRegulaciónspa
dc.subjectDesigualdadspa
dc.subjectPandemiaspa
dc.subjectNeoliberalismopor
dc.subjectSistemas de saúde públicapor
dc.subjectRegulaçãopor
dc.subjectDesigualdadepor
dc.subjectPandemiapor
dc.titleNeoliberalismo y crisis de la salud pública: privatización, desigualdad y búsqueda de eficienciaspa
dc.titleNeoliberalism and Public Health Crisis: Privatization, Inequality, and a Quest for Efficiencyeng
dc.titleNeoliberalismo e a crise da saúde pública: privatização, desigualdade e a busca pela eficiênciapor
dc.typeArticle
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.localArtículo científicospa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Opinion_Juridica_646.pdf
Tamaño:
402.32 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format