Prueba pericial compuesta : una propuesta desde la visión epistemológica de la verdad y la función de la prueba del Profesor Michele Taruffo
Cargando...
Archivos
Compartir
Fecha
Autores
Título de la revista
ISSN de la revista
Título del volumen
Editor
Documentos PDF
Resumen
Descripción
Si algo caracterizó al Profesor Michele Taruffo fue su preocupación por la prueba como instrumento para llegar a la verdad mediante el proceso judicial, porque ¿de qué sirve una prueba si solamente se usa para persuadir al juez?. Al respecto, valioso legado académico y científico dejó el Maestro para formación de juristas sobre proceso, pruebas y valoración y aunque no hay medio de prueba que escape a sus teorías, este artículo se centra en la prueba pericial, la forma como la entendió y la crítica realizada, aportando a su concepción lo que se considera una manera de llegar a la prueba pericial que sirva para explicar, científicamente, si un hecho pudo ocurrir, todo lo cual se hará defendiendo que la prueba pericial en materia penal requiere, en casos complejos, una configuración de prueba pericial compuesta que disipe la penumbra de conocimiento en la cual entra la prueba pericial emitida por una parte y la refutación de la que es objeto por la expertise que aporta la otra parte.
If anything characterized Professor Michele Taruffo, it was his concern for evidence as an instrument to reach the truth through the judicial process, because what good is a test if it is only used to persuade the judge? In this regard, valuable academic and scientific legacy left by the Master for the training of jurists on process, tests and evaluation and although there is no means of proof that escapes his theories, this article focuses on the expert evidence, the way he understood it and the criticism made, contributing to his conception what is considered a way to reach the expert evidence that serves to explain, scientifically, if an event could occur, all of which will be done by defending that expert evidence in criminal matters requires, in complex cases, a configuration of composite expert evidence that dispels the gloom of knowledge in which the expert evidence issued by one party enters and the refutation of which it is subject by the expertise provided by the other party.
If anything characterized Professor Michele Taruffo, it was his concern for evidence as an instrument to reach the truth through the judicial process, because what good is a test if it is only used to persuade the judge? In this regard, valuable academic and scientific legacy left by the Master for the training of jurists on process, tests and evaluation and although there is no means of proof that escapes his theories, this article focuses on the expert evidence, the way he understood it and the criticism made, contributing to his conception what is considered a way to reach the expert evidence that serves to explain, scientifically, if an event could occur, all of which will be done by defending that expert evidence in criminal matters requires, in complex cases, a configuration of composite expert evidence that dispels the gloom of knowledge in which the expert evidence issued by one party enters and the refutation of which it is subject by the expertise provided by the other party.
Palabras clave
Prueba pericial, prueba de refutación, valoración de la prueba, método racional de valoración de la prueba, prueba pericial compuesta, Expert evidence, rebuttal evidence, evaluation of evidence, rational method of evaluation of evidence, composite expert evidence