GEM research: Achievements and challenges

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.affiliationBusiness Economics Department, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spainspa
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversidad de Medellín, Medellín, Colombiaspa
dc.contributor.affiliationSchool of Business and Economics, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chilespa
dc.contributor.authorAlvarez C.
dc.contributor.authorUrbano D.
dc.contributor.authorAmoros J.E.
dc.date.accessioned2015-10-09T13:16:45Z
dc.date.available2015-10-09T13:16:45Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.description.abstractThis article analyzes the content and evolution of research based on the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) project. We conducted a rigorous search of articles published in journals within the Thomson Reuters' Social Sciences Citation Index® through an exploratory analysis focused on articles using GEM data. The main findings of this study reveal that the institutional approach is the most commonly used conceptual framework. Also, although there are still few academic publications using GEM data, the number of articles is increasing, as are opportunities for future research. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York.eng
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11187-013-9517-5
dc.identifier.issn0921898X
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11407/1324
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofSmall Business Economics, marzo de 2014, volume 42, issue 3, pp 445-465eng
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11187-013-9517-5#page-1
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.sourceScopusspa
dc.subject.proposalGEMeng
dc.subject.proposalGlobal entrepreneurship monitoreng
dc.subject.proposalInstitutional approacheng
dc.subject.proposalLiterature revieweng
dc.subject.proposalSocial Sciences Citation Indexeng
dc.titleGEM research: Achievements and challengesspa
dc.typeArticle
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article

Archivos

Colecciones

Indexados Scopus