Systematic Literature study on estimation and prioritization of quality requirements in software development [Estudio sistemático de literatura sobre estimación y priorización de requisitos de calidad en desarrollo de software]

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.affiliationSalamea, M.J., Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Enginyeria de Serveis i Sistemes d'Informació (ESSI), Barcelona, Spain
dc.contributor.affiliationGonzalez-Palacio, L., Universidad de Medellín, Ingeniería de Sistemas, Medellín, Colombia
dc.contributor.affiliationOriol, M., Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Essi, Barcelona, Spain
dc.contributor.affiliationFarre, C., Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Essi, Barcelona, Spain
dc.contributor.authorSalamea M.J.
dc.contributor.authorGonzalez-Palacio L.
dc.contributor.authorOriol M.
dc.contributor.authorFarre C.
dc.date2020
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-05T14:58:52Z
dc.date.available2021-02-05T14:58:52Z
dc.descriptionQuality requirements (also known as non-functional requirements) are those that address the quality of the software. They involve diverse aspects such as availability, security, performance, scalability, portability and usability, among others. Continuous technological advances such as cloud computing or the Internet of Things present new challenges in guaranteeing a satisfactory level of quality in these aspects. Moreover, agile development methodologies, whose use is increasing, such as SCRUM, XP, Kanban, do not provide the necessary support for the management of these quality requirements. To support software engineers when making decisions about the level of quality needed in a project, it is essential to know in advance (1) what criteria will be considered to verify, prioritize, plan, and/or negotiate quality requirements. Likewise, it is necessary to specify (2) how these criteria will be evaluated and (3) what factors in the project context may affect that evaluation. To try to answer these 3 research questions, the authors of this article have designed and are carrying out a systematic literature review. This article presents for discussion the description of the methodology followed in that literature review, as well as some of the preliminary results obtained during its execution. © 2020 AISTI.
dc.identifier.doi10.23919/CISTI49556.2020.9140957
dc.identifier.isbn9789895465903
dc.identifier.issn21660727
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11407/6025
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherIEEE Computer Societyspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ingenieríasspa
dc.publisher.programIngeniería de Sistemasspa
dc.relation.citationvolume2020-June
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85089016219&doi=10.23919%2fCISTI49556.2020.9140957&partnerID=40&md5=bbd6ed0240a6d8ef9345fdf9d9e0b93a
dc.relation.referencesAbbas, N., Gravell, A.M., Wills, G.B., The impact of organization, project and governance variables on software quality and project success (2010) Agile Conference
dc.relation.referencesHowarth, T., Greenwood, D., (2017) Construction Quality Management: Principles and Practice: Routledge
dc.relation.referencesKabir, M.A., Rehman, M.U., Majumdar, S.I., An analytical and comparative study of software usability quality factors (2016) IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE
dc.relation.referencesMicro, C., Sogeti, F., World Quality Report 2017-2018, , https.//www.sogeti.com/globalassets/global/downloads/testing/wqr-2017-2018/wqr2017v9secure.pdf
dc.relation.referencesTricentis: Software Fail Watch: 5th Edition. White Paper, , https://www.tricentis.com/resources/software-fail-watch-5th-edition/
dc.relation.referencesOriol, M., Seppänen, P., Behutiye, W., Data-driven elicitation of quality requirements in agile companies (2019) International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology (QUATIC
dc.relation.referencesLópez, L., Partanen, J., Rodríguez, P., Martínez-Fernández, S., How Practitioners manage quality requirements in rapid software development: A survey (2018) International Workshop on Quality Requirements in Agile Projects (QuaRAP
dc.relation.referencesSehra, S.K., Brar, Y.S., Kaur, N., Sehra, S.S., Research patterns and trends in software effort estimation (2017) Information and Software Technology, 91
dc.relation.referencesNaik, P., Nayak, S., Insights on research techniques towards cost estimation in software design (2017) International Journal of Electrical & Computer Engineering.Vol, 7 (5)
dc.relation.referencesVazquez, P., Panizzi, M., Bertone, R., Estimación del esfuerzo del proceso de implantación de software basada en el método de Puntos de Caso de Uso/Estimating the effort of the software implantation process based on the Use Case Points method (2019) Brazilian Journal of Development, 5 (2)
dc.relation.referencesAli, A., Hafeez, Y., Abbas, S.F., Sarwar, A., Requirements prioritization: A comparison between traditional and agile (Scrum and FDD) (2018) International Conference on Statistical Sciences
dc.relation.referencesLeshob, A., Hadaya, P., Renard, L., Software requirements prioritization with the goal-oriented requirement language (2019) International Conference on E-Business Engineering (ICEBE
dc.relation.referencesKitchenham, B.A., Charters, S., Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering version 2 (2007) 3, Keele University and University of Durham, EBSE Technical Report
dc.relation.referencesWohlin, C., Second-generation systematic literature studies using snowballing (2016) International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE
dc.relation.referencesBudgen, D., Turner, M., Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B.A., Using mapping studies in software engineering (2008) PPIG
dc.relation.referencesPetersen, K., Feldt, R., Mujtaba, S., Mattsson, M., Systematic mapping studies in software engineering (2008) International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.sourceIberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, CISTI
dc.subjectagilismspa
dc.subjectestimationspa
dc.subjectnon-functional requirementspa
dc.subjectprioritizationspa
dc.subjectquality requirementsspa
dc.subject.proposalInformation systemseng
dc.subject.proposalInformation useeng
dc.subject.proposalSoftware designeng
dc.subject.proposalAgile development methodologieseng
dc.subject.proposalLiterature reviewseng
dc.subject.proposalLiterature studieseng
dc.subject.proposalNon-functional requirementseng
dc.subject.proposalQuality requirementseng
dc.subject.proposalResearch questionseng
dc.subject.proposalSystematic literature revieweng
dc.subject.proposalTechnological advanceseng
dc.subject.proposalSoftware qualityeng
dc.titleSystematic Literature study on estimation and prioritization of quality requirements in software development [Estudio sistemático de literatura sobre estimación y priorización de requisitos de calidad en desarrollo de software]
dc.typeConference Paper
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Archivos

Colecciones

Indexados Scopus