Revisión bibliométrica del Fracking como forma de extracción de petróleo

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.audienceComunidad Universidad de Medellínspa
dc.contributor.authorGuerrero Molina, María Isabel
dc.contributor.authorCorrea Zapata, Camila
dc.contributor.authorHerrera Peña, Valentina
dc.coverage.spatialLat: 06 15 00 N degrees minutes Lat: 6.2500 decimal degreesLong: 075 36 00 W degrees minutes Long: -75.6000 decimal degrees
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-15T15:33:37Z
dc.date.available2025-09-15T15:33:37Z
dc.date.issued2024-10-11
dc.descriptionEl proceso de extracción de gas y petróleo de manera no convencional genera diferentes situaciones en el medio ambiente, por ello, el objetivo es desarrollar una revisión bibliométrica del fracking como práctica de extracción de petróleo; para la elaboración del presente artículo se utilizó el método cuantitativo, en el cual se implementaron herramientas bibliométricas para extraer registros tomados de las bases de datos de Scopus y analizar con RStudio, se tuvieron en cuenta cuatro variables: revistas, autores, universidades y países que hayan desenvuelto en el tema. Los hallazgos parciales exponen las afectaciones derivadas de la extracción de petróleo por medio del fracking, en relación a las ganancias obtenidas en el sector, teniendo en cuenta el marco de la crisis climática, puesto que, en medio de las investigaciones relacionadas al tema, tanto en el campo ambiental como económico, no se han presentado soluciones para promover la mitigación del cambio climático. Se presenta las tendencias de estudio del impacto del fracking y aspectos legales.spa
dc.descriptionThe non-conventional gas and oil extraction process causes diverse impacts on the environment. Therefore, this article aims to carry out a bibliometric review of fracking as an oil extraction process. The quantitative method was used to create this article by using bibliometric tools to extract records from the Scopus database and analyze them with RStudio. Four variables were considered: journals, authors, universities, and countries that have worked with this topic. Partial findings show the effects of fracking oil extraction in relation to the profits earned in the sector, taking into account the climate crisis, as the studies addressing this topic, both from the environmental and the economic fields, have not presented solutions to promote climate change mitigation. The trends of fracking impacts research and legal aspects are presented.eng
dc.description.abstractO processo de extração não convencional de petróleo e gás gera diferentes situações no meio ambiente, portanto, o objetivo é desenvolver uma revisão bibliométrica do fracking como prática de extração de petróleo; para a elaboração deste artigo foi utilizado o método quantitativo, no qual foram implementadas ferramentas bibliométricas para extrair registros retirados das bases de dados Scopus e analisar com o RStudio, quatro variáveis foram levadas em consideração: periódicos, autores, universidades e países que se desenvolveram no assunto. Os resultados parciais expõem os efeitos derivados da extração de petróleo através do fracking, em relação aos lucros obtidos no sector, tendo em conta o quadro da crise climática, uma vez que, no meio da investigação relacionada com o tema, tanto no domínio ambiental como económico, não foram apresentadas soluções para promover a mitigação das alterações climáticas. São apresentadas as tendências no estudo do impacto do fracking e os aspectos legais.por
dc.format.extentp. 1-23spa
dc.format.mediumElectrónicospa
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypePDF
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.22395/seec.v27n63a4605
dc.identifier.eissn2248-4345
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad de Medellínspa
dc.identifier.issn0120-6346
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellínspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.udem.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11407/9160
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad de Medellínspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ciencias Económicas y Administrativasspa
dc.publisher.placeMedellínspa
dc.relation.citationendpage23
dc.relation.citationissue63
dc.relation.citationstartpage1
dc.relation.citationvolume27
dc.relation.haspartSemestre Económico; Vol. 27 Núm. 63 julio-diciembre 2024spa
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSemestre Económico; Vol. 27 No. 63 (2024)spa
dc.relation.referencesAbraham, D. G., Liberatore, H. K., Aziz, M. T., Burnett, D. B., Cizmas, L. H., y Richardson, S. D. (2023). Impacts of hydraulic fracturing wastewater from oil and gas industries on drinking water: Quantification of 69 disinfection by-products and calculated toxicity. The Science of the Total Environment, 882, 163344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163344
dc.relation.referencesAczel, M., Heap, R., Workman, M., Hall, S., Armstrong, H., y Makuch, K. (2022). Anticipatory Regulation: Lessons from fracking and insights for Greenhouse Gas Removal innovation and governance. Energy Research y Social Science, 90, 102683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102683
dc.relation.referencesAgarwal, M., y Kudapa, V. K. (2022). Comparing the performance of supercritical CO2 fracking with high energy gas fracking in unconventional shale. MRS Energy y Sustainability, 9(2), 461–468. https://doi.org/10.1557/s43581-022-00043-x
dc.relation.referencesAlmaliki, D., Bashir, M., Llamas, J. (2022) Assessment of groundwater contamination and the role of hydraulic fracturing operation in Weld County, USA. (2022). Global NEST Journal. https://doi.org/10.30955/gnj.004247
dc.relation.referencesAlthani, M., y Lange, I. (2023). US tight-oil efficiency: A Permian basin case study. Proceedings of the 11th Unconventional Resources Technology Conference. Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, Colorado Convention Center, Denver, Colorado, US. https://doi.org/10.15530/urtec-2023-3832698
dc.relation.referencesAlzate Cárdenas, M. del S., Guerrero Molina, M. I., y Gonzales Garcés, V. (2022). Bioeconomía. Una revisión y análisis sistemáticos desde la bibliometría. En Contexto, 10(17). https://doi.org/10.53995/23463279.1246
dc.relation.referencesAria, M., y Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
dc.relation.referencesArmstrong, R. W., Antolovich, S. D., Griffiths, J. R., y Knott, J. F. (2015). Fracturing across the multi-scales of diverse materials. Phi ophical Transactions. Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences, 373(2038). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0474
dc.relation.referencesArnold, G., Klasic, M., Schomburg, M., York, A., Baum, M., Cherin, M., Cliff, S., Kavousi, P., Miller, A. T., Shajari, D., Wang, Y., y Zialcita, L. (2022). Boom, bust, action! How communities can cope with boom‐bust cycles in unconventional oil and gas development. The Review of Policy Research, 39(5), 541–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12490
dc.relation.referencesAtencio, M., James-Tohe, H., Sage, S., Tsosie, D. J., Beasley, A., Grant, S., y Seamster, T. (2022). Federal Statutes and Environmental Justice in the Navajo Nation: The Case of Fracking in the Greater Chaco Region. American Journal of Public Health, 112(1), 116–123. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306562
dc.relation.referencesBalise, V. D., Meng, C.-X., Cornelius-Green, J. N., Kassotis, C. D., Kennedy, R., y Nagel, S. C. (2016). Systematic review of the association between oil and natural gas extraction processes and human reproduction. Fertility and Sterility, 106(4), 795–819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.07.1099
dc.relation.referencesBarroso-Maldonado, J. M., Aceves, S. M., y Belman-Flores, J. M. (2023). Synthesis of N2-hydrocarbon refrigerant composition for maximum LNG production in PRICO processes. Applied Thermal Engineering, 219, 119485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.119485
dc.relation.referencesBartie, P., Varley, A., Dickie, J., Evensen, D., Devine-Wright, P., Ryder, S., Whitmarsh, L., y Foad, C. (2023). Great Britain’s spatial twitter activity related to “fracking.” Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 103, 101978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2023.101978
dc.relation.referencesBirkhimer, N., DeSutter, T. M., Jore, K., Staricka, J., y Meehan, M. (2023). Effects of pipeline and well‐pad reclamation on topsoil properties: A meta‐analysis. Agrosystems, Geosciences y Environment, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.20387
dc.relation.referencesBolden, A. L., Schultz, K., Pelch, K. E., y Kwiatkowski, C. F. (2018). Exploring the endocrine activity of air pollutants associated with unconventional oil and gas extraction. Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source, 17(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-018-0368-z
dc.relation.referencesBond, M., Zawacki-Richter, O., y Nichols, M. (2019). Revisiting five decades of educational technology research: A content and authorship analysis of the British Journal of Educational Technology. British Journal of Educational Technology: Journal of the Council for Educational Technology, 50(1), 12–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12730
dc.relation.referencesBondu, R., Kloppmann, W., Naumenko-Dèzes, M. O., Humez, P., y Mayer, B. (2021). Potential Impacts of Shale Gas Development on Inorganic Groundwater Chemistry: Implications for Environmental Baseline Assessment in Shallow Aquifers. Environmental Science y Technology, 55(14), 9657–9671. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c01172
dc.relation.referencesBratman, E., Auch, T., y Stinchfield, B. (2022). The fracking frontier in the United States: A case study of foreign investment, civil liberties and land ethics in the shale industry. Development and Change. 53(3), 469-494. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12707
dc.relation.referencesBu, T., Chen, F., He, X., Yang, Y., y Wang, W. (2018). Researching the complexing conditions of residual boron in produced water from oil and gas fields. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 116, 254–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.02.013
dc.relation.referencesCaldwell, J. A., Williams, C. K., Brittingham, M. C., y Maier, T. J. (2022). A consideration of wildlife in the benefit-costs of hydraulic fracturing: Expanding to an E3 analysis. Sustainability: Science Practice and Policy, 14(8), 4811. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084811
dc.relation.referencesCao, W., Zhang, L., Miao, Y., y Qiu, L. (2021). Research progress in the enhancement technology of soil vapor extraction of volatile petroleum hydrocarbon pollutants. Environmental Science. Processes y Impacts, 23(11), 1650–1662. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EM00170A
dc.relation.referencesCostello, R. Á. (2014). Reviving rylands: How the doctrine could be used to claim compensation for environmental damages caused by fracking. Review of European, Comparative y International Environmental Law, 23(1), 134–143. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1EM00170A
dc.relation.referencesCotton, M., y Charnley-Parry, I. (2018). Beyond opposition and acceptance: Examining public perceptions of the environmental and health impacts of unconventional oil and gas extraction. Current Opinion in Environmental Science y Health, 3, 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2018.01.001
dc.relation.referencesDavis, J., Garcia, E. A., Gibb, K. S., Kennard, M. J., Rose, A., Stromsoe, N., y Wedd, D. (2023). The importance of groundwater for riverine fish faunas in a region of shale gas development in northern Australia. Frontiers of Environmental Science y Engineering in China, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1106862
dc.relation.referencesDe Rijke, K. (2018). Produced water, money water, living water: Anthropological perspectives on water and fracking. WIREs. Water, 5(2), e1272. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1272
dc.relation.referencesDieng, А., Khiznyk, G. P., y Poplygin, V. V. (2023). Prediction of the efficiency of hydraulic fracturing based on reservoir parameters. International Journal of Engineering, 36(12), 2169–2174. https://doi.org/10.5829/IJE.2023.36.12C.05
dc.relation.referencesErokhin, D., y Komendantova, N. (2023). The role of bots in spreading conspiracies: Case study of discourse about earthquakes on Twitter. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 92, 103740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.103740
dc.relation.referencesEsterhuyse, S. (2018). Identifying the risks and opportunities of unconventional oil and gas extraction using the strategic environmental assessment. Current Opinion in Environmental Science y Health, (3), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2018.03.009
dc.relation.referencesEsterhuyse, S., Avenant, M., Redelinghuys, N., Kijko, A., Glazewski, J., Plit, L., Kemp, M., Smit, A., Vos, A. T., y Williamson, R. (2016). A review of biophysical and socio-economic effects of unconventional oil and gas extraction - Implications for South Africa. Journal of Environmental Management, 184(Pt 2), 419–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.065
dc.relation.referencesEsterhuyse, S., Vermeulen, D., y Glazewski, J. (2022). Developing and enforcing fracking regulations to protect groundwater resources. Npj Clean Water, 5(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41545-021-00145-y
dc.relation.referencesEvensen, D. (2016). Ethics and “fracking”: a review of (the limited) moral thought on shale gas development. WIREs. Water, 3(4), 575–586. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1152
dc.relation.referencesEvensen, D., Varley, A., Whitmarsh, L., Devine-Wright, P., Dickie, J., Bartie, P., Napier, H., Mosca, I., Foad, C., y Ryder, S. (2022). Effect of linguistic framing and information provision on attitudes towards induced seismicity and seismicity regulation. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 11239. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-15448-4
dc.relation.referencesFaber, A.-H., Brunner, A. M., Schimmel, M., Schot, P. P., de Voogt, P., y van Wezel, A. (2023). Effects of high pressure and temperature conditions on the chemical fate of flowback water related chemicals. The Science of the Total Environment, 888, 163888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163888
dc.relation.referencesFerreyra-Quiroz, M., Lira-Barragán, L. F., El-Halwagi, M. M., y Ponce-Ortega, J. M. (2022). Optimization of the Water-Energy Nexus in Hydraulic Fracturing Processes Using CO2 and Water as Fracturing Fluids. ACS Sustainable Chemistry y Engineering, 10(51), 17043–17058. https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c03880
dc.relation.referencesFinkel, M. L., y Hays, J. (2013). The implications of unconventional drilling for natural gas: a global public health concern. Public Health, 127(10), 889–893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2013.07.005
dc.relation.referencesFinkel, M. L., y Law, A. (2011). The rush to drill for natural gas: a public health cautionary tale. American Journal of Public Health, 101(5), 784–785. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2010.300089
dc.relation.referencesGalloway, B., Zanocco, C., Song, G., y Jones, M. (2023). The effect of policy narratives on policy elite versus public preferences for hydraulic fracturing regulation. The Review of Policy Research, 41(4), 613-634. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12563
dc.relation.referencesGuerrero, M. I., Salazar, J. F., y Taborda, J. (2022). Reflections on Brexit and Migration: Literature Review. Apuntes del Cenes, 41(74), 111–139. https://doi.org/10.19053/01203053.v41.n74.2022.13735
dc.relation.referencesHaddad, A. Z., Hackl, L., Akuzum, B., Pohlman, G., Magnan, J.-F., y Kostecki, R. (2023). How to make lithium extraction cleaner, faster and cheaper - in six steps. Nature, 616(7956), 245–248. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00978-2
dc.relation.referencesHoffmann, H. M. (2017). Fracking the Sacred: Resolving the Tension between Unconventional Oil and Gas Development and Tribal Cultural Resources. SSRN Electronic Journal, 94(2). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2776722
dc.relation.referencesHowey, K., & Neale, T. (2022). Divisible Governance: Making Gas-fired Futures during Climate Collapse in Northern Australia. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 48(5), 1080-1109. https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439211072573
dc.relation.referencesJackson, R. B., Vengosh, A., Carey, J. W., Davies, R. J., Darrah, T. H., O’Sullivan, F., y Pétron, G. (2014). The environmental costs and benefits of fracking. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 39(1), 327–362. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-031113-144051
dc.relation.referencesJacquet, J. B., Junod, A. N., Bugden, D., Wildermuth, G., Fergen, J. T., Jalbert, K., Rahm, B., Hagley, P., Brasier, K. J., Schafft, K., Glenna, L., Kelsey, T., Fershee, J., Kay, D. L., Stedman,
dc.relation.referencesR. C., & Ladlee, J. (2018). A decade of Marcellus Shale: Impacts to people, policy, and culture from 2008 to 2018 in the Greater Mid-Atlantic region of the United States. The Extractive Industries and Society, 5(4), 596–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2018.06.006
dc.relation.referencesJunfeng, P. A. N., Chuang, L. U., Xiaohui, M. A., Yongxue, X. I. A., Fei, X. I. E., Gang, X. U., Guidong, D. O. U., Dazhao, L. Y. U., Xiaodong, S. U. N., y Wentao, M. A. (2023). System and application of regional fracking of coal seam roof on and under the ground to prevent rockburst. Coal Science and Technology, 51(2), 106–115. https://www.mtkxjs.com.cn/en/article/doi/10.13199/j.cnki.cst.2022-0903
dc.relation.referencesKahrilas, G. A., Blotevogel, J., Stewart, P. S., y Borch, T. (2015). Biocides in hydraulic fracturing fluids: a critical review of their usage, mobility, degradation, and toxicity. Environmental Science y Technology, 49(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1021/es503724k
dc.relation.referencesLampe, D. J., y Stolz, J. F. (2015). Current perspectives on unconventional shale gas extraction in the Appalachian Basin. Journal of Environmental Science and Health. Part A, Toxic/hazardous Substances y Environmental Engineering, 50(5), 434–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2015.992653
dc.relation.referencesLenhard, L. G., Andersen, S. M., y Coimbra-Araújo, C. H. (2018). Energy-environmental implications of shale gas exploration in Paraná hydrological basin, Brazil. Renewable y Sustainable Energy Rev., 90, 56–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.042
dc.relation.referencesLiew, M. S., Danyaro, K. U., y Zawawi, N. A. W. A. (2020). A comprehensive guide to different fracturing technologies: A review. Energies, 13(13), 3326. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13133326
dc.relation.referencesLifton, V. A. (2016). Microfluidics: an enabling screening technology for enhanced oil recovery (EOR). Lab on a Chip, 16(10), 1777–1796. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6LC00318D
dc.relation.referencesLiu, J., Yang, Y., Goetjen, T. A., y Hupp, J. T. (2022). Carbon-efficient conversion of natural gas and natural-gas condensates to chemical products and intermediate feedstocks via catalytic metal–organic framework (MOF) chemistry. Energy y Environmental Science, 15(7), 2819–2842. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EE01010K
dc.relation.referencesMajumdar, S. R., y Chun, B. (2023). Fracking and Traffic Crashes in Eagle Ford Shale of Texas. Public Works Management & Policy, 28(2), 163–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X221100559
dc.relation.referencesMakati, D., Akers, J., Aljuhani, M., Pellegrino, B., Schmidt, R., Shawwa, K., y Kannabhiran, D. (2022). Prevalence of ANCA-associated vasculitis amid natural gas drilling sites in West Virginia. Journal of Nephrology, 35(4), 1185–1192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-021-01243-3
dc.relation.referencesMa, L., Hurtado, A., Eguilior, S., y Llamas Borrajo, J. F. (2023). Acute and chronic risk assessment of BTEX in the return water of hydraulic fracturing operations in Marcellus Shale. The Science of the Total Environment, 906, 167638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167638
dc.relation.referencesMcLimans, C. J., Shelledy, K., Conrad, W., Prendergast, K., Le, A. N., Grant, C. J., y Buonaccorsi, V. P. (2022). Potential biomarkers of endocrine and habitat disruption identified via RNA-Seq in Salvelinus fontinalis with proximity to fracking operations in Pennsylvania headwater stream ecosystems. Ecotoxicology, 31(6), 1044–1055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-022-02564-0
dc.relation.referencesMattfeldt, A. (2022). Risk in discourses around fracking: a discourse linguistic perspective on the UK, the USA and Germany. Journal of Risk Research, 25(3), 317–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2021.1881992
dc.relation.referencesMatthews, J., y Hansen, A. (2018). Fracturing debate? A review of research on media coverage of “fracking.” Frontiers in Communication, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2018.00041
dc.relation.referencesMischen, P. A. (2022). Small, Local Governments and Their Management of Hydraulic Fracturing. Environmental Management, 69(3), 514–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-021-01551-1
dc.relation.referencesMooney, R., Boudet, H. S., y Hazboun, S. O. (2022). Risk-benefit perceptions of natural gas export in Oregon. Local Environment, 27(3), 342–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2022.2040470
dc.relation.referencesMurtazashvili, I., Rayamajhee, V., y Taylor, K. (2023). The Tragedy of the Nurdles: Governing Global Externalities. Sustainability: Science Practice and Policy, 15(9), 7031. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15097031
dc.relation.referencesNagel, S. C., Kassotis, C. D., Vandenberg, L. N., Lawrence, B. P., Robert, J., y Balise, V. D. (2020). Developmental exposure to a mixture of unconventional oil and gas chemicals: A review of experimental effects on adult health, behavior, and disease. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, 513, 110722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2020.110722
dc.relation.referencesPaylor, A. (2017). The social–economic impact of shale gas extraction: a global perspective. Third World Quarterly, 38(2), 340–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2016.1153420
dc.relation.referencesQian, Y., Li, Q., Hu, Q., Jiang, Z., Liu, R., Li, J., Li, W., y Yu, C. (2023). Extraction and identification of spectrum characteristics of coal and rock hydraulic fracturing and uniaxial compression signals. International Journal of Coal Science y Technology, 10(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40789-023-00610-8
dc.relation.referencesRinaldi, P. N. (2023). Water science in the public sphere: A narrative network analysis of fracking and oil spills in Colombian media. The Extractive Industries and Society, 13, 101215. https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0433099
dc.relation.referencesShi, H., He, X., Zhou, C., Wang, L., y Xiao, Y. (2023). Hydrochemistry, Sources and Management of Fracturing Flowback Fluid in Tight Sandstone Gasfield in Sulige Gasfield (China). Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 84(2), 284–298.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-023-00983-6
dc.relation.referencesShi, W., Zhu, L., Guo, M., Huang, Z., Wang, G., Lin, L., He, L., Liao, Y., He, H., y Gong, J. (2023). Assessment of CO2 fracturing in China’s shale oil reservoir: Fracturing effectiveness and carbon storage potential. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 197, 107101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107101
dc.relation.referencesSilva, T. L. S., Morales-Torres, S., Castro-Silva, S., Figueiredo, J. L., y Silva, A. M. T. (2017). An overview on exploration and environmental impact of unconventional gas sources and treatment options for produced water. Journal of Environmental Management, 200, 511–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.06.002
dc.relation.referencesSoriano, M. A., Jr, Deziel, N. C., y Saiers, J. E. (2022). Regional Scale Assessment of Shallow Groundwater Vulnerability to Contamination from Unconventional Hydrocarbon Extraction. Environmental Science y Technology, 56(17), 12126–12136. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c00470
dc.relation.referencesSun, Y., Wang, D., Tsang, D. C. W., Wang, L., Ok, Y. S., y Feng, Y. (2019). A critical review of risks, characteristics, and treatment strategies for potentially toxic elements in wastewater from shale gas extraction. Environment International, 125, 452–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.02.019
dc.relation.referencesTao, Z., Liu, C., He, Q., Chang, H., y Ma, J. (2022). Detection and treatment of organic matters in hydraulic fracturing wastewater from shale gas extraction: A critical review. The Science of the Total Environment, 824, 153887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153887
dc.relation.referencesTorres, L., Yadav, O. P., y Khan, E. (2016). A review on risk assessment techniques for hydraulic fracturing water and produced water management implemented in onshore unconventional oil and gas production. The Science of the Total Environment, 539, 478–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.030
dc.relation.referencesVadillo Fernández, L., Fernández Naranjo, F. J., Rodríguez Gómez, V., y López Gutiérrez, J. (2017). Revisión de la casuística sobre sismicidad inducida por producción y almacenamiento de hidrocarburos. Boletín Geológico y Minero, 128(1), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.21701/bolgeomin.128.1.014
dc.relation.referencesWilde, S. E., Hopkins, J. R., Lewis, A. C., Dunmore, R. E., Allen, G., Pitt, J. R., Ward, R. S., y Purvis, R. M. (2023). The air quality impacts of pre-operational hydraulic fracturing activities. The Science of the Total Environment, 858(Pt 1), 159702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159702
dc.relation.referencesWinter, L. R., Cooper, N. J., Lee, B., Patel, S. K., Wang, L., y Elimelech, M. (2022). Mining Nontraditional Water Sources for a Distributed Hydrogen Economy. Environmental Science y Technology, 56(15), 10577–10585. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c02439
dc.relation.referencesWu, F., Zhou, Z., Zhang, S., Cheng, F., Tong, Y., Li, L., Zhang, B., Zeng, X., Li, H., Wang, D., Yu, Z., y You, J. (2023). Toxicity identification evaluation for hydraulic fracturing flowback and produced water during shale gas exploitation in China: Evidence from tissue residues and gene expression. Water Research, 241, 120170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2023.120170
dc.relation.referencesWyss, R. (2014). Die Erschliessung und Nutzung der Energiequellen des tiefen Untergrundes der Schweiz: Risiken und Chancen. https://doi.org/10.5169/SEALS-583927
dc.relation.referencesYudhowijoyo, A., Rafati, R., Sharifi Haddad, A., Raja, M. S., y Hamidi, H. (2018). Subsurface methane leakage in unconventional shale gas reservoirs: A review of leakage pathways and current sealing techniques. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 54, 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2018.04.013
dc.relation.referencesZacher, S. (2023). The US Political Economy of Climate Change: Impacts of the “Fracking” Boom on State-Level Climate Policies. State Politics y Policy Quarterly, 23(2), 140–165. https://doi.org/10.1017/spq.2022.17
dc.relation.referencesZawadzki, J., y Bogacki, J. (2016). Smart magnetic markers use in hydraulic fracturing. Chemosphere, 162, 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.07.058
dc.relation.referencesZhang, G., Wu, T., Li, J., Pang, Q., Yang, H., Liu, G., Huang, H., y Zhu, Y. (2023). Dynamics simulation of the effect of cosolvent on the solubility and tackifying behavior of PDMS tackifier in supercritical CO2 fracturing fluid. Colloids and Surfaces. A, Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 662, 130985. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2023.130985
dc.relation.referencesZhang, Y., Wang, M., Zipperle, M., Abbasi, A., y Tani, M. (2023). RelRank: A relevance-based author ranking algorithm for individual publication venues. Information Processing y Management, 60(1), 103156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2022.103156
dc.relation.urihttps://revistas.udem.edu.co/index.php/economico/article/view/4605
dc.rights.creativecommonsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0*
dc.sourceSemestre Económico; Vol. 27 No. 63 (2024): (julio-diciembre); 1-23
dc.subjectMedio ambientespa
dc.subjectCrecimiento sosteniblespa
dc.subjectDesarrollo sosteniblespa
dc.subjectClimaspa
dc.subjectContaminación del airespa
dc.subjectExtracción de petróleospa
dc.subjectREstudiospa
dc.subjectAnálisis bibliométricospa
dc.subjectFractura hidráulicaspa
dc.subjectEnvironmenteng
dc.subjectSustainable growtheng
dc.subjectSustainable developmenteng
dc.subjectClimateeng
dc.subjectAir pollutioneng
dc.subjectOil extractioneng
dc.subjectRStudioeng
dc.subjectBibliometric analysiseng
dc.subjectHydraulic fracturingeng
dc.subjectAmbientepor
dc.subjectCrescimento sustentávelpor
dc.subjectDesenvolvimento sustentávelpor
dc.subjectClimapor
dc.subjectPoluição atmosféricapor
dc.subjectExtração de petróleopor
dc.subjectRstudio. análise bibliométricapor
dc.subjectFraturamento hidráulicopor
dc.titleRevisión bibliométrica del Fracking como forma de extracción de petróleospa
dc.titleBibliometric review of Fracking as an oil extraction methodeng
dc.titleRevisão bibliométrica do Fracking como forma de extracção de petróleopor
dc.typeArticle
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.localArtículo científicospa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
Semestre_Economico_526.pdf
Tamaño:
588.11 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descargar

Colecciones

Semestre Económico Vol. 27, Número 63 (2024)