Glencore v Colombia:1 A Tale of Legally Coerced Evidence

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.affiliationMazuera, A., University of Medellín, Colombia
dc.contributor.authorMazuera A.
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-31T21:07:16Z
dc.date.available2024-07-31T21:07:16Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.description[No abstract available]
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/icsidreview/siad008
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad de Medellínspa
dc.identifier.issn2583690
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellínspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.udem.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11407/8529
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherOxford University Pressspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Derechospa
dc.publisher.programDerechospa
dc.relation.citationendpage285
dc.relation.citationissue2
dc.relation.citationstartpage274
dc.relation.citationvolume38
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85183943143&doi=10.1093%2ficsidreview%2fsiad008&partnerID=40&md5=584f1edec9481ca96cfc092c19644319
dc.relation.references(2019) Glencore International AG and CI Prodeco SA v Republic of Colombia, , ICSID Cas ARB/16/6, Award (27 August) (Juan Fernández-Armesto, President
dc.relation.referencesOscar M Garibaldi
dc.relation.referencesJ Christopher Thomas)
dc.relation.referencesLLM in Comparative and International Dispute Resolution at Queen Mary University of London, , LLM in International Law at Universitat Heidelberg. LLB at University of Medellín. Email: agmazuera@gmail.com
dc.relation.referencesWaincymer, Jeffrey Maurice, (2012) Procedure and Evidence in International Arbitration, p. 797. , (Kluwer Law International)
dc.relation.referencesPilkov, Konstantin, Evidence in International Arbitration: Criteria for Admission and Evaluation (2014) Arb: Int'l J Arb, Med & Dis Mgmt, 80, p. 147. , 154
dc.relation.referencesde, Thomas Wal, Equality of Arms in Investment Arbitration Procedural Challenges (2010) Arbitration under International Investment Agreements: A Guide to the Key Issues, p. 162. , Katia Yannaca-Small (ed), (OUP)
dc.relation.referencesGlencore, Award, (1)
dc.relation.referencesibid paras, pp. 145-157
dc.relation.referencesibid para 197
dc.relation.referencesibid para 487
dc.relation.referencesibid para 520
dc.relation.referencesibid para 530
dc.relation.referencesibid para 525
dc.relation.referencesibid para 1149
dc.relation.referencesibid para 547
dc.relation.referencesibid para 549
dc.relation.referencesibid para 859
dc.relation.referencesibid para 938
dc.relation.referencesibid para 1540
dc.relation.referencesibid para 1547
dc.relation.referencesibid para 24
dc.relation.referencesibid para 78
dc.relation.referencesibid para 73
dc.relation.referencesibid para 84
dc.relation.referencesibid paras 89-90
dc.relation.referencesibid para 95
dc.relation.referencesibid para 96
dc.relation.referencesibid para 100
dc.relation.references(2021) Glencore International AG and CI Prodeco SA v Republic of Colombia, p. 100. , ICSID Cas ARB/16/6, Decision on Annulment (22 September) para
dc.relation.references(2011) Vito G Gallo v The Government of Canada, , UNCITRAL, PCA Cas 55798, Award (15 September)
dc.relation.referencesGlencore, Decision on Annulment, (28), p. 116. , para
dc.relation.referencesGlencore, Award, (1), p. 105. , para
dc.relation.referencesibid para 129
dc.relation.referencesGlencore, Decision on Annulment, (28), p. 147. , para
dc.relation.referencesibid para 150
dc.relation.referencesGlencore, Award, (1), p. 658. , para
dc.relation.referencesibid para 659
dc.relation.referencesibid para 747
dc.relation.referencesGlencore, Decision on Annulment, (27), p. 239. , para
dc.relation.referencesibid para 242
dc.relation.referencesibid para 246
dc.relation.referencesibid paras, pp. 261-264
dc.relation.referencesibid para 311
dc.relation.referencesibid para 312
dc.relation.referencesibid para 315
dc.relation.referencesibid para 320
dc.relation.referencesibid para 324
dc.relation.referencesibid para 359
dc.relation.referencesibid para 364
dc.relation.referencesSchreuer, Christoph, (2009) The ICSID Convention: A Commentary, p. 643. , and others, (2nd edn, CUP)
dc.relation.referencesBlackaby, Nigel, (2015) Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration, p. 378. , and others, (6th edn, Kluwer Law International)
dc.relation.references(2002) Middle East Cement Shipping and Handling Co SA v Arab Republic of Egypt, p. 75. , ICSID Cas ARB/99/6, Award (12 April) para
dc.relation.referencesPilkov, (4), p. 154
dc.relation.references(2013) The Rompetrol Group NV v Romania, p. 181. , ICSID Cas ARB/06/3, Award (6 May) para
dc.relation.referencesSourgens, Frédéric, (2018) Evidence in International Investment Arbitration, p. 237. , and others, (OUP)
dc.relation.referencesKolo, Abba, Witness Intimidation, Tampering and Other Related Abuses of Process in Investment Arbitration: Possible Remedies Available to the Arbitral Tribunal (2010) Arb Intl, 26, p. 43. , 70. For instance, the American Arbitration Association (AAA) International Arbitration Rules (2021) specifically address the of legal privilege (art 25)
dc.relation.references(2016) Gabriel Resources Ltd and Gabriel Resources (Jersey) v Romania, ICSID Case No ARB/15/31, Decision on Claimants' Second Request for Provisional Measures, pp. 91-97. , (22 November) paras
dc.relation.referencesGlencore, Decision on Annulment, (27), p. 245
dc.relation.references(2008) Libananco Holdings Co Limited v Republic of Turkey, , ICSID Cas ARB/06/8, Decision on Preliminary Issues (23 June) para 79
dc.relation.referencesibid para 80
dc.relation.referencesCorfu Channel Case (UK v Albania) (Judgment) (1949), ICJ Rep 4
dc.relation.referencesFallah, Sara, (2020) 'The Admissibility of Unlawfully Obtained Evidence before International Courts and Tribunals
dc.relation.referencesLPICT, 147, p. 156
dc.relation.referencesibid 151
dc.relation.referencesBorn, Gary, (2021) International Commercial Arbitration, p. 2550. , (3rd edn, Kluwer Law International)
dc.relation.references(2009) Azurix Corp v Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No ARB/01/12, Decision on the Application for Annulment of Argentina, p. 217. , (1 September) para
dc.relation.references(2017) Niko Resources (Bangladesh) Ltd v Bangladesh Petroleum Exploration & Production Company Limited ('Bapex') and Bangladesh Oil Gas and Mineral Corporation ('Petrobangla'), p. 88. , ICSID Cas ARB/10/18, Procedural Order No 22 (27 July) para
dc.relation.references(2013) the Matter of the Indus Waters Kishenganga Arbitration between the Islamic Republic of Pakistan and the Republic of India, p. 97. , Partial Award (18 February) para
dc.relation.referencesCorfu Channel, (60), p. 32
dc.relation.referencesBorn, (63), p. 2555
dc.relation.referencesGlencore, Award, (1), p. 89. , para
dc.relation.referencesibid para 86
dc.relation.referencesQuiborax, SA, Non-Metallic Minerals SA and Allan Fosk Kaplún v Plurinational State of Bolivia (2010), ICSID Cas ARB/06/2, Decision on Provisional Measures (26 February) para 46
dc.relation.referencesibid paras, pp. 164-165
dc.relation.references(2007) City Oriente Ltd v Republic of Ecuador and Empresa Estatal Petrol eos del Ecuador (Petroecuador), pp. 62-63. , ICSID Cas ARB/06/21, Decision on Provisional Measures (19 November) paras
dc.relation.references(2014) Lao Holdings NV v Lao People's Democratic Republic, ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/12/6, Ruling on Motion to Amend the Provisional Measures Order, , (30 May) para 27
dc.relation.referencesibid para 26
dc.relation.referencesde, Thomas Wal, Procedural Challenges in Investment Arbitration under the Shadow of the Dual Role of the State: Asymmetries and Tribunals' Duty to Ensure, Pro-actively, the Equality of Arms (2010) Arb Intl, 26, p. 3. , 38
dc.relation.referencesibid 39
dc.relation.references(2009) Caratube International Oil Company LLP v Republic of Kazakhstan, p. 140. , ICSID Cas ARB/08/12, Decision Regarding Claimant's Application for Provisional Measures (31 July) para
dc.relation.references(2010) Caratube International Oil Company LLP v Republic of Kazakhstan, , ICSID Cas ARB/08/12, Procedural Order No 2 Regarding Document Production (14 April) para 3.3
dc.relation.references(2012) Caratube International Oil Company LLP v Republic of Kazakhstan, p. 403. , ICSID Cas ARB/08/12, Award (5 June) para
dc.relation.references(2008) EDF (Services) Limited v Romania, , ICSID Cas ARB/05/13, Procedural Order No 3 (29 August) para 47
dc.relation.references(2011) Spyridon Roussalis v Romania, p. 122. , ICSID Cas ARB/06/1, Award (7 December) para
dc.relation.referencesibid para 236
dc.relation.referencesLibananco, (58), p. 79. , para
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.sourceICSID Review
dc.sourceICSID Rev.
dc.sourceScopus
dc.titleGlencore v Colombia:1 A Tale of Legally Coerced Evidenceeng
dc.typenote
dc.typeother
dc.type.localOtrospa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Archivos

Colecciones

Indexados Scopus