Comparative study between M. oleifera and aluminum sulfate for water treatment: case study Colombia

dc.contributor.affiliationCivil and Agricultural Program, National University of Colombia, Bogotá, Colombiaspa
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Medellin, Medellin, Colombiaspa
dc.contributor.affiliationCivil Engineering Program, University of Nariño, San Juan de Pasto, Nariño, Colombiaspa
dc.contributor.authorSalazar Gámez L.L.
dc.contributor.authorLuna-delRisco M.
dc.contributor.authorCano R.E.S.
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-17T19:23:55Z
dc.date.available2015-12-17T19:23:55Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractThe world has a water deficit, mostly located in developing countries. For example, in Colombia, water deficit is a major concern and it increases in rural areas, where the rate of accessibility to drinking water is of 33.26 % in 2005. Since the 1970s, the most used technology for water purification is the conventional physicochemical process. The most common coagulant used in this process is aluminum sulfate (alum). This study focuses on a comparison between Moringa oleifera seeds and alum for water treatment in different natural waters. Results showed that M. oleifera removed 90 % turbidity and alum 96 % from water samples from the tested natural brook. However, color removal for M. oleifera was 95 and 80.3 % for alum. For water-polluted samples, both coagulants have shown high efficiency (100 %) in color and turbidity removal. Usage of natural coagulants (i.e., M. oleifera) instead of chemical ones (i.e., alum) are more convenient in rural areas where the economic situation and accessibility of those products are key elements to maintain fresh water treatment standards. Additionally, results demonstrated that high dosages M. oleifera did not affect the optimal value in terms of color and turbidity removal. In rural and developing countries, this is important because it does not require a sophisticated dosing equipment.eng
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10661-015-4793-y
dc.identifier.issn1676369
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11407/1530
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishersspa
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2015, volume 187, issue 10eng
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10661-015-4793-y
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.sourceScopusspa
dc.subject.proposalAlumeng
dc.subject.proposalColoreng
dc.subject.proposalFreshwater treatmenteng
dc.subject.proposalM. oleiferaeng
dc.subject.proposalNatural coagulantseng
dc.subject.proposalTurbidityeng
dc.titleComparative study between M. oleifera and aluminum sulfate for water treatment: case study Colombiaeng
dc.typeArticle
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article

Archivos

Colecciones