Thermodynamic Assessment of a Biomass Gasification-Driven Tri-generation Chemical Loop Combustion Setup: A Colombian Case Study

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.affiliationZea J., Grupo de Investigación en Ingeniería en Energía—GRINEN, Universidad de Medellín, Medellín, Colombia
dc.contributor.affiliationMartínez B., Grupo de Investigación en Ingeniería en Energía—GRINEN, Universidad de Medellín, Medellín, Colombia
dc.contributor.affiliationRisco M.L.-D., Grupo de Investigación en Ingeniería en Energía—GRINEN, Universidad de Medellín, Medellín, Colombia
dc.contributor.affiliationRocha-Meneses L., Biosystems Engineering, Institute of Forestry and Engineering, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu, Estonia
dc.contributor.affiliationSierra J., Department of Mechatronics Engineering—MATyER, Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano, Medellin, Colombia
dc.contributor.affiliationYepes H.A., Aplicaciones en Termofluidos, Ingeniería en Energía y Nanomateriales Avanzados—ATENA, Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica, Universidad Francisco de Paula Santander Ocaña, Ocaña, Colombia
dc.contributor.affiliationArrieta C.E., Grupo de Investigación en Ingeniería en Energía—GRINEN, Universidad de Medellín, Medellín, Colombia
dc.contributor.affiliationGómez Montoya J.P., Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica, Universidad Tecnológica del Perú, Lima, Peru
dc.contributor.affiliationArredondo C.A., Grupo de Investigación en Ingeniería en Energía—GRINEN, Universidad de Medellín, Medellín, Colombia
dc.contributor.affiliationVanegas E., Grupo de Investigación en Ingeniería en Energía—GRINEN, Universidad de Medellín, Medellín, Colombia
dc.contributor.authorZea J.
dc.contributor.authorMartínez B.
dc.contributor.authorRisco M.L.-D.
dc.contributor.authorRocha-Meneses L.
dc.contributor.authorSierra J.
dc.contributor.authorYepes H.A.
dc.contributor.authorArrieta C.E.
dc.contributor.authorGómez Montoya J.P.
dc.contributor.authorArredondo C.A.
dc.contributor.authorVanegas E.
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-08T14:23:40Z
dc.date.available2025-09-08T14:23:40Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.descriptionAs the world seeks sustainable energy solutions, the importance of innovative technologies that meet various energy needs while reducing greenhouse gas emissions is growing. In hot regions like northern Colombia in Latin America, where cooling demand is significant but heating demand is low, tri-generation systems offer efficient solutions for the simultaneous generation of cooling, heating, and power. This study examines the thermodynamic performance of a biomass gasification-based chemical looping combustion (CLC)-driven tri-generation system using a system proposed in the literature. The setup consists of a biomass gasification-driven CLC module, functioning as the main heat provider for two gas turbines, an organic Rankine cycle for power production, an absorption chiller for cooling, and two heat exchangers for heating purposes. The objective is to evaluate the thermodynamic performance of this system. Our findings highlight the potential of this innovative technology in addressing the energy needs of hot, rapidly developing regions like northern Colombia while reducing carbon emissions. A comprehensive thermodynamic investigation was conducted to determine the system’s optimal operational parameters. Under optimized conditions, the system exhibits notable energy and exergy efficiencies of 45.17% and 20.83%, respectively. A substantial portion of the exergy losses is within the gasifier and CLC sections. Specifically, the gasifier, air reactor, and fuel reactor account for 19.27%, 24.20%, and 22.24% of the exergy losses. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the impacts of various parameters, like operating pressure, reactor temperature, and stream temperature, on the energy and exergy efficiencies. © The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2025.
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-031-88995-0_5
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad de Medellínspa
dc.identifier.isbn978-303188994-3
dc.identifier.issn18653529
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellínspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.udem.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11407/9082
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ingenieríasspa
dc.publisher.programIngeniería en Energíaspa
dc.relation.citationendpage74
dc.relation.citationstartpage57
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-105009218058&doi=10.1007%2f978-3-031-88995-0_5&partnerID=40&md5=7125a15c346cc824691e747170ad0b2b
dc.relation.referencesMohamed U., Zhao Y., Yi Q., Shi L., Wei G., Nimmo W., Evaluation of life cycle energy, economy, and CO<sub>2</sub> emissions for biomass chemical looping gasification to power generation, Renew. Energy., 176, pp. 366-387, (2021)
dc.relation.referencesZhao X., Zhou H., Sikarwar V.S., Zhao M., Park A.-H.A., Fennell P.S., Et al., Biomass-based chemical looping technologies: The good, the bad and the future, Energy Environ. Sci., 10, pp. 1885-1910, (2017)
dc.relation.referencesHaregu S., Likna Y., Tadesse D., Masi C., Recent development of biomass energy as a sustainable energy source to mitigate environmental change, Bioenergy: Impacts on Environment and Economy, pp. 119-138, (2023)
dc.relation.referencesSun Z., Aziz M., Thermodynamic analysis of a tri-generation system driven by biomass direct chemical looping combustion process, Energy Convers. Manag., 244, (2021)
dc.relation.referencesAbuelgasim S., Wang W., Abdalazeez A., A brief review for chemical looping combustion as a promising CO<sub>2</sub> capture technology: Fundamentals and progress, Sci. Total Environ., 764, (2021)
dc.relation.referencesZhou L., Deshpande K., Zhang X., Agarwal R.K., Process simulation of chemical looping combustion using ASPEN plus for a mixture of biomass and coal with various oxygen carriers, Energy, 195, (2020)
dc.relation.referencesMei D., Soleimanisalim A.H., Linderholm C., Lyngfelt A., Mattisson T., Reactivity and lifetime assessment of an oxygen releasable manganese ore with biomass fuels in a 10 kWth pilot rig for chemical looping combustion, Fuel Process. Technol., 215, (2021)
dc.relation.referencesSurywanshi G.D., Pillai B.B.K., Patnaikuni V.S., Vooradi R., Anne S.B., 4-E analyses of chemical looping combustion based subcritical, supercritical and ultra-supercritical coal-fired power plants, Energy Convers. Manag., 200, (2019)
dc.relation.referencesMarrugo G., Valdes C.F., Chejne F., Characterization of Colombian Agroindustrial Biomass Residues as Energy Resources. Energy Fuel, 30, pp. 8386-8398, (2016)
dc.relation.referencesAdanez-Rubio I., Abad A., Gayan P., de Diego L.F., Garcia-Labiano F., Adanez J., Biomass combustion with CO<sub>2</sub> capture by chemical looping with oxygen uncoupling (CLOU), Fuel Process. Technol., 124, pp. 104-114, (2014)
dc.relation.referencesCoppola A., Scala F., Chemical looping for combustion of solid biomass: A review, Energy Fuel, 35, pp. 19248-19265, (2021)
dc.relation.referencesLabiano F.G., Estado Actual Y Retos De Los Procesos Chemical Looping. Current Status and Challenges of Chemical Looping Processes
dc.relation.referencesGogolev I., Pikkarainen T., Kauppinen J., Linderholm C., Steenari B.-M., Lyngfelt A., Investigation of biomass alkali release in a dual circulating fluidized bed chemical looping combustion system, Fuel, 297, (2021)
dc.relation.referencesMagdziarz A., Dalai A.K., Kozinski J.A., Chemical composition, character and reactivity of renewable fuel ashes, Fuel, 176, pp. 135-145, (2016)
dc.relation.referencesBhui B., Vairakannu P., Chemical looping and plasma technologies for gasification of coal and biomass, Coal and Biomass Gasification, pp. 499-520, (2018)
dc.relation.referencesPenthor S., Mayer K., Kern S., Kitzler H., Woss D., Proll T., Et al., Chemical-looping combustion of raw syngas from biomass steam gasification—coupled operation of two dual fluidized bed pilot plants, Fuel, 127, pp. 178-185, (2014)
dc.relation.referencesFan J., Hong H., Zhu L., Jiang Q., Jin H., Thermodynamic and environmental evaluation of biomass and coal co-fuelled gasification chemical looping combustion with CO<sub>2</sub> capture for combined cooling, heating and power production, Appl. Energy., 195, pp. 861-876, (2017)
dc.relation.referencesSpallina V., Romano M.C., Chiesa P., Lozza G., Integration of coal gasification and packed bed CLC process for high efficiency and near-zero emission power generation, Energy Procedia, 37, pp. 662-670, (2013)
dc.relation.referencesJimenez Alvaro A., Urdiales Montesino A., Sanchez Orgaz S., Gonzalez Fernandez C., Thermodynamic analysis of a dual power-hydrogen production system based on chemical-looping combustion, Energy, 137, pp. 1075-1085, (2017)
dc.relation.referencesSegurado R., Pereira S., Correia D., Costa M., Techno-economic analysis of a trigeneration system based on biomass gasification, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 103, pp. 501-514, (2019)
dc.relation.referencesFan L.-S., Chung E.Y., Bayham S.C., Kathe M.V., Tong A., Zeng L., Chemical looping combustion and gasification, Handbook of Clean Energy Systems, pp. 1-22, (2015)
dc.relation.referencesCzakiert T., Krzywanski J., Zylka A., Nowak W., Chemical looping combustion: A brief overview, Energies, 15, (2022)
dc.relation.referencesMedina J.M., Rodriguez C.M., Coronado M.C., Garcia L.M., Scoping review of thermal comfort research in Colombia, Buildings, 11, (2021)
dc.relation.referencesAguilera-Diaz M.M., Reina-Aranza Y.C., Orozco A., Vega J.Y., Barcos-Robles R., Evolución socioeconómica De La región Caribe Colombiana Entre 1997 Y, 2017, (2017)
dc.relation.referencesDong Y., Coleman M., Miller S.A., Greenhouse gas emissions from air conditioning and refrigeration service expansion in developing countries, Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., 46, pp. 59-83, (2021)
dc.relation.referencesHabibi R., Pourfayaz F., Mehrpooya M., Kamali H., A natural gas-based eco-friendly polygeneration system including gas turbine, sorption-enhanced steam methane reforming, absorption chiller and flue gas CO<sub>2</sub> capture unit, Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess., 52, (2022)
dc.relation.referencesBoles M.A., Yunus A.C., Mehmet K., (2019)
dc.relation.referencesCadavez C.C., de Souza-Santos M.L., Efficiency of a power generation alternative regarding the composition of feeding biomass-glycerol slurry
dc.relation.referencestheoretical assessment, Energy, 214, (2021)
dc.relation.referencesOruc O., Dincer I., Evaluation of hydrogen production with iron-based chemical looping fed by different biomass, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy., 45, pp. 34557-34565, (2020)
dc.relation.referencesMotta I.L., Miranda N.T., Maciel Filho R., Wolf Maciel M.R., Sugarcane bagasse gasification: Simulation and analysis of different operating parameters, fluidizing media, and gasifier types, Biomass Bioenergy, 122, pp. 433-445, (2019)
dc.relation.referencesNandy A., Loha C., Gu S., Sarkar P., Karmakar M.K., Chatterjee P.K., Present status and overview of chemical looping combustion technology, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 59, pp. 597-619, (2016)
dc.relation.referencesWang X., Wang X., Kong Z., Shao Y., Jin B., Auto-thermal operation and optimization of coal-fueled separated gasification chemical looping combustion in a pilot-scale unit, Chem. Eng. J., 383, (2020)
dc.relation.referencesCheng D., Yong Q., Zhao Y., Gong B., Zhang J., Study on the interaction of the Fe-based oxygen carrier with ashes, Energy Fuel, 34, pp. 9796-9809, (2020)
dc.relation.referencesLyngfelt A., Brink A., Langorgen O., Mattisson T., Ryden M., Linderholm C., 11,000 h of chemical-looping combustion operation—where are we and where do we want to go?, Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control., 88, pp. 38-56, (2019)
dc.relation.referencesOgidiama O.V., Abu-Zahra M.R.M., Shamim T., Techno-economic analysis of a polygeneration solar-assisted chemical looping combustion power plant, Appl. Energy., 228, pp. 724-735, (2018)
dc.relation.referencesJiang P., Mahmud Parvez A., Meng Y., Dong X., Xu M., Luo X., Et al., Novel two-stage fluidized bed-plasma gasification integrated with SOFC and chemical looping combustion for the high efficiency power generation from MSW: A thermodynamic investigation, Energy Convers. Manag., 236, (2021)
dc.relation.referencesOzcan H., Dincer I., Thermodynamic analysis of a combined chemical looping-based trigeneration system, Energy Convers. Manag., 85, pp. 477-487, (2014)
dc.relation.referencesTavares R., Monteiro E., Tabet F., Rouboa A., Numerical investigation of optimum operating conditions for syngas and hydrogen production from biomass gasification using Aspen Plus, Renew. Energy., 146, pp. 1309-1314, (2020)
dc.relation.referencesYu J., Smith J.D., Validation and application of a kinetic model for biomass gasification simulation and optimization in updraft gasifiers, Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif., 125, pp. 214-226, (2018)
dc.relation.referencesStenberg V., Spallina V., Mattisson T., Ryden M., Techno-economic analysis of processes with integration of fluidized bed heat exchangers for H<sub>2</sub> production—part 2: Chemical-looping combustion, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy., 46, pp. 25355-25375, (2021)
dc.relation.referencesWang J., Fu C., Thermodynamic analysis of a solar-hybrid trigeneration system integrated with methane chemical-looping combustion, Energy Convers. Manag., 117, pp. 241-250, (2016)
dc.relation.referencesWang S., Liu C., Li J., Sun Z., Chen X., Wang X., Exergoeconomic analysis of a novel trigeneration system containing supercritical CO<sub>2</sub> Brayton cycle, organic Rankine cycle and absorption refrigeration cycle for gas turbine waste heat recovery, Energy Convers. Manag., 221, (2020)
dc.rights.accesoRestricted access
dc.rights.accessrightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/restrictedAccess
dc.sourceGreen Energy and Technology
dc.sourceGreen Energy and Technology
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBiomass gasification
dc.subjectChemical looping combustion
dc.subjectExergy and energy efficiency
dc.subjectThermodynamic analysis
dc.subjectTri-generation
dc.subjectAbsorption cooling
dc.subjectBiomass
dc.subjectCombustion
dc.subjectCooling systems
dc.subjectEnergy efficiency
dc.subjectExergy
dc.subjectGas generators
dc.subjectGasification
dc.subjectGreenhouse gases
dc.subjectSensitivity analysis
dc.subjectTemperature
dc.subjectBiomass Gasification
dc.subjectChemical looping combustion
dc.subjectColombia
dc.subjectEnergy needs
dc.subjectExergy and energy
dc.subjectExergy and energy efficiency
dc.subjectGeneration systems
dc.subjectInnovative technology
dc.subjectThermo dynamic analysis
dc.subjectTri-generation
dc.subjectThermoanalysis
dc.titleThermodynamic Assessment of a Biomass Gasification-Driven Tri-generation Chemical Loop Combustion Setup: A Colombian Case Study
dc.typeConference paper
dc.type.localDocumento de conferenciaspa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Archivos

Colecciones

Indexados Scopus