A model for forming teams for the evaluation activity of the requirements phase, based on Belbin team roles: an exploratory study

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.audienceComunidad Universidad de Medellínspa
dc.contributor.authorRosado Castillo, Nailea
dc.contributor.authorAguileta Güemez, Antonio Armando
dc.contributor.authorAguilera Vera, Raúl Antonio
dc.coverage.spatialLat: 06 15 00 N degrees minutes Lat: 6.2500 decimal degreesLong: 075 36 00 W degrees minutes Long: -75.6000 decimal degrees
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-17T14:03:30Z
dc.date.available2025-09-17T14:03:30Z
dc.date.issued2025-07-22
dc.descriptionThis research examines the proposed model’s viability for forming sof- tware requirements validation teams, based on Belbin’s Role Theory. The study seeks to determine whether teams formed according to the model improve in evaluating requirement quality criteria compared to randomly formed teams. A factorial experimental design was carried out with two treatments: Constructed Teams (EC, for its acronym in Spanish) and Random Teams (EA, for its acronym in Spanish), evaluating metrics such as Comprehensibility, Unambiguity, Feasibility, Internal Consistency, and Verifiability. The descriptive analysis revealed that EC teams tend to have more consistent ratings on Comprehensibility and less variability on other criteria. In contrast, EA teams show a greater dispersion in their ratings, with higher averages on some criteria such as Consistency and Verifiability. The Mann-Whitney U test indicated that, in general, there are no statistically significant differences between the two types of teams, suggesting that the proposed model does not have a consistent impact on the quality of the requirements evaluated. This study provides a basis for future research on the effectiveness of the model in varied contexts.eng
dc.descriptionEsta investigación examina la viabilidad del modelo propuesto para formar equipos de validación de requisitos de software, basado en la Teoría de los Roles de Belbin. El estudio pretende determinar si los equipos formados según el modelo mejoran en la evaluación de criterios de calidad de requisitos en comparación con equipos formados aleatoriamente. Se llevó a cabo un diseño experimental factorial con dos tratamientos: Equipos Construidos (EC, por sus siglas en español) y Equipos Aleatorios (EA, por sus siglas en español), evaluando métricas tales como Comprensibilidad, Inambigüedad, Viabilidad, Consistencia Interna, y Verificabilidad. El análisis descriptivo reveló que los equipos EC tienden a tener puntuaciones más consistentes en Comprensibilidad y menos variabilidad en otros criterios. Por el contrario, los equipos de EA muestran una mayor dispersión en sus valoraciones, con medias más altas en algunos criterios como la Coherencia y Verificabilidad. La prueba U de Mann-Whitney indicó que, en general, no existen diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los dos tipos de equipos, lo que sugiere que el modelo propuesto no tiene un impacto consistente en la calidad de los requisitos evaluados. Este estudio proporciona una base para futuras investigaciones sobre la eficacia del modelo en contextos variados.spa
dc.format.extentp. 1-17spa
dc.format.mediumElectrónicospa
dc.format.mimetypePDF
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.22395/rium.v24n46a1
dc.identifier.eissn2248-4094
dc.identifier.instnameinstname:Universidad de Medellínspa
dc.identifier.issn1692-3324
dc.identifier.reponamereponame:Repositorio Institucional Universidad de Medellínspa
dc.identifier.repourlrepourl:https://repository.udem.edu.co/
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11407/9166
dc.language.isospa
dc.publisherUniversidad de Medellínspa
dc.publisher.facultyFacultad de Ingenieríasspa
dc.publisher.placeMedellínspa
dc.relation.citationendpage17
dc.relation.citationissue46
dc.relation.citationstartpage1
dc.relation.citationvolume24
dc.relation.haspartRevista Ingenierías Universidad de Medellín; Vol. 24 Núm. 46 enero-junio 2025spa
dc.relation.ispartofseriesRevista Ingenierías Universidad de Medellín; Vol. 24 No. 46 (2025)spa
dc.relation.referencesA. Chakraborty, M. K. Baowaly, A. Arefin, and A. Bahar, “The Role of Requirement Engineering in Software Development Life Cycle,” 2012.
dc.relation.referencesJ. McManus, “A stakeholder perspective within software engineering projects,” 2004 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37574), vol. 2, pp. 880–884, 2004, doi: 10.1109/IEMC.2004.1407508.
dc.relation.referencesM. Farhangian, M. K. Purvis, M. Purvis, and B. T. R. Savarimuthu, “Modeling team formation in self-assembling software development teams,” Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS, pp. 1319–1320, 2016.
dc.relation.referencesA. R. Gilal, J. Jaafar, S. Basri, M. Omar, and M. Z. Tunio, “Making programmer suitable for team-leader: Software team composition based on personality types,” 2015 International Symposium on Mathematical Sciences and Computing Research, iSMSC 2015 - Proceedings, pp. 78–82, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1109/ISMSC.2015.7594031.
dc.relation.referencesT. L. Lewis and W. J. Smith, “Building software engineering teams that work: The impact of dominance on group conflict and performance outcomes,” Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 2008, doi: 10.1109/FIE.2008.4720498.
dc.relation.referencesA. Alshamrani and A. Bahattab, “A Comparison Between Three SDLC Models Waterfall Model, Spiral Model, and Incremental/Iterative Model”, Accessed: Jul. 07, 2023. [Online]. Available: www.IJCSI.org
dc.relation.referencesR. A. Aguilar Vera, J. C. Díaz Mendoza, M. A. Muñoz-Mata, and J. P. Ucán Pech, “Influence of Belbin’s Roles in the Quality of the Software Requirements Specification Development by Student Teams,” Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 1071, pp. 91–101, 2020, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-33547-2_8/COVER.
dc.relation.referencesA. A. Aguileta-Güemez, J. P. Ucán-Pech, and R. A. Aguilar-Vera, “Explorando la influencia de los roles de Belbin en la calidad del código generado por estudiantes en un curso de ingeniería de software,” Revista Educación en Ingeniería, vol. 12, no. 23, p. 93, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.26507/REI.V12N23.742.
dc.relation.referencesN. Rosado, A. Agüileta, R. Aguilar y J. Ucán, “Composición de Equipos en las Fases de Desarrollo de la Ingeniería de Software: Un Mapeo Sistemático,” Abstraction and Application, Mérida, 2023.
dc.relation.referencesP. Bourque and R. Fairley, “Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge SWE- BOK® A Project of the IEEE Computer Society,” Piscataway, 2014.
dc.relation.referencesR. M. Belbin, “Team roles at work,” p. 153, 2010. “UNIDAD 6. EL PROCESO DE ANÁLISIS,” Madrid.
dc.relation.referencesS. Lauesen, Software Requirements, Styles and Techniques. Addison-Wesley, 2002.
dc.relation.referencesIEEE, “IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology,” Office, vol. 121990, no. 1, p. 1, 1990, doi: 10.1109/IEEESTD.1990.101064.
dc.relation.referencesD. Jorge Horacio, “Explicitar Requisitos del Software usando Escenarios,” 2009, Accessed: Jun. 23, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221235253 [16] Stellman, A., and Greene, J., Applied Software Project Management, O’Reilly Media, Inc., 2005.
dc.relation.referencesK. E. Wiegers and J. Beatty, Software requirements, 3rd ed. Pearson Education, 2013.
dc.relation.referencesJ. Lamri and T. Lubart, “Reconciling Hard Skills and Soft Skills in a Common Framework: The Generic Skills Component Approach,” Journal of Intelligence 2023, Vol. 11, Page 107, vol. 11, no. 6, p. 107, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.3390/JINTELLIGENCE11060107.
dc.relation.referencesL. M. Spencer y S. M. Spencer, Competencia en el trabajo: modelos para un rendimiento superior. Wiley, 1993.
dc.relation.referencesT. Bishop, “The Hard Truth about Soft Skills,” Muma Business Review, vol. 1, 2017.
dc.relation.referencesK. Kechagias, Teaching and assessing soft skills, no. September. 1st Second Chance School of Thessaloniki (Neapolis), 2011.
dc.relation.referencesC. Palumbo, “Soft Skills and Job Satisfaction: Two Models in Comparison,” Article in Uni- versal Journal of Psychology, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 103–106, 2013, doi: 10.13189/ujp.2013.010303.
dc.relation.referencesJ. Mahasneh, W. Thabet, and J. Khalaf Mahasneh, “Developing a Normative Soft Skills Taxonomy for Construction Education,” J. Civil Eng. Architect. Res, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 1468–1486, 2016, Accessed: Jul. 09, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate. net/publication/327350993
dc.relation.referencesB. Boehm, A. Egyed, J. Kwan, D. Port, A. Shah, and R. Madachy, “Using the WinWin Spiral Model: A Case Study,” Computer (Long Beach Calif), vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 33–44, 1998.
dc.relation.referencesR. M. Belbin, Team roles at work. Oxford: Elsevier Butterworth Heinemann, 1993. Accessed: Jul. 02, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://books.google.com/books/about/Team_Ro- les_at_Work.html?id=tPGpQgAACAAJ
dc.relation.urihttps://revistas.udem.edu.co/index.php/ingenierias/article/view/5147
dc.rights.creativecommonsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0*
dc.sourceRevista Ingenierías Universidad de Medellín; Vol. 24 No. 46 (2025): (enero-junio ); 1-17
dc.subjectTeam Modeleng
dc.subjectSoft Skillseng
dc.subjectBelbin Roleseng
dc.subjectExperimental Designeng
dc.subjectRequirements Phaseeng
dc.subjectModelo de Equipospa
dc.subjectHabilidades Blandasspa
dc.subjectRoles Belbinspa
dc.subjectDiseño Experimentalspa
dc.subjectFase de Requisitosspa
dc.titleA model for forming teams for the evaluation activity of the requirements phase, based on Belbin team roles: an exploratory studyeng
dc.titleUn modelo para conformar equipos en la actividad de evaluación de la fase de requisitos, basado en los roles de equipo Belbin: un estudio exploratoriospa
dc.typeArticle
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
dc.type.driverinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.localArtículo científicospa
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Miniatura
Nombre:
Revista_Ingenierias_UdeM_457.pdf
Tamaño:
485.84 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descargar

Colecciones

Revista Ingenierías Universidad de Medellín Vol. 24, núm. 46 (2025)